2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Negativity of CD56 and CD117 Links to Unfavorable Cytogenetic Abnormalities and Predicts Poor Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma

Abstract: The prognostic value of CD56 and CD117 expression on myeloma cells is controversial. This study aims to analyze the correlation of CD56 and CD117 expression with cytogenetic abnormalities and survival. A total of 128 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) were recruited in this single-center retrospective study. Flow cytometry and FISH tests of marrow cells were performed for all of the subjects. The statistical methods included a chi-squared test, univariate and multivariate COX regressions, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CD markers exclusively targeting VSELSCs, such as NANOG/CD44, SSEA4, and CD133, despite their effectiveness for samples directly from the organism [18,21], show lower efficiency in cell lines [19,20]. To ensure consistency in interpreting findings from previous studies [15,16] and to distinguish between different developmental stages within the tested cell lines, we chose CD56 [26][27][28]. Its presence also serves as an indicator of a poorer prognosis in multiple myeloma [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CD markers exclusively targeting VSELSCs, such as NANOG/CD44, SSEA4, and CD133, despite their effectiveness for samples directly from the organism [18,21], show lower efficiency in cell lines [19,20]. To ensure consistency in interpreting findings from previous studies [15,16] and to distinguish between different developmental stages within the tested cell lines, we chose CD56 [26][27][28]. Its presence also serves as an indicator of a poorer prognosis in multiple myeloma [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure consistency in interpreting findings from previous studies [15,16] and to distinguish between different developmental stages within the tested cell lines, we chose CD56 [26][27][28]. Its presence also serves as an indicator of a poorer prognosis in multiple myeloma [27]. For ALL cells (Jurkat and Raji), the CD56 marker was substituted with CD2 [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%