2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual ownership, returns, and voting in mergers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is expected, since bidders tend to be larger, be more diversified, and have higher credit ratings. Previous studies find no evidence of such positive returns in domestic M&As for investment-grade targets (Billett et al, 2004;Bodnaruk and Rossi, 2016).…”
Section: Abnormal Bond Returns Around Manda Announcementsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is expected, since bidders tend to be larger, be more diversified, and have higher credit ratings. Previous studies find no evidence of such positive returns in domestic M&As for investment-grade targets (Billett et al, 2004;Bodnaruk and Rossi, 2016).…”
Section: Abnormal Bond Returns Around Manda Announcementsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Lastly, we consider whether the bidding firm has a creditor-shareholder, a bank or other financial institution that both lends to and invest in the firm. This dual holdership phenomenon is well-documented for Continental Europe, but 10% of US shares are also held by creditor-shareholders (Bodnaruk and Rossi, 2016). The influence of a creditor-shareholder may not only make M&As more creditor-friendly, but facilitate access to debt or better credit terms to finance the deal (Jiang et al, 2010).…”
Section: (Insert Table 4 About Here)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This result indicates that bondholders perceive such changes either as a signal sent by managers about firm profitability or as a way to prevent empire building, and not as a wealth transfer from creditors to shareholders. Another approach used in the literature to measure the strength of the shareholder-creditor conflict relies on the existence of dual holders who simultaneously hold equity and debt claims of the same firm (Bodnaruk & Rossi, 2016;Jiang et al, 2010). Building on this approach, Chu (2017) shows that firms pay lower dividends when there is diminished conflict between shareholders and creditors; this suggests that the shareholder-creditor conflict leads firms to higher pay outs to the detriment of creditors.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literature and Hypotheses Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, e.g., Maxwell and Rao (2003) for spin-offs, Maxwell and Rao (2003) for share repurchases, Penas and Unal (2004) for bank mergers, and Ambrose et al (2012) for fallen angels. Several studies employ 2-or 3-month event windows for mergers and acquisitions (Billett et al (2004)), for leveraged buyouts (Baran and King (2010)), and for mergers (Bodnaruk and Rossi (2016)). Thus, in addition to the return on the filing month, we further calculate bond returns over two additional event windows: (−1, 0) and (−1, 1).…”
Section: A Estimation Of Excess Security Returns and Change In Overamentioning
confidence: 99%