In Vivo Body Composition Studies 1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1473-8_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Photon Absorptiometry: Validation of Mineral and Fat Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They were all healthy, nonsmokers, non-obese (body mass index ¼ 25^2 kg=m 2 ), with a normal physical examination, routine blood work and thyroid function tests, taking no medication, not depressed as assessed by the Beck questionnaire (14), with an oral glucose tolerance test within the normal range, and a stable body weight for at least 3 months prior to the study. Total body fat (mean 21^6%) was measured by DEXA scan (15). Their baseline glucose, insulin and leptin levels were respectively 5:1^0:4 mmol=l; 71^29 pmol=l and 5^4 ng=ml: The study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of St Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital, and informed written consent was obtained prior to inclusion in the study.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were all healthy, nonsmokers, non-obese (body mass index ¼ 25^2 kg=m 2 ), with a normal physical examination, routine blood work and thyroid function tests, taking no medication, not depressed as assessed by the Beck questionnaire (14), with an oral glucose tolerance test within the normal range, and a stable body weight for at least 3 months prior to the study. Total body fat (mean 21^6%) was measured by DEXA scan (15). Their baseline glucose, insulin and leptin levels were respectively 5:1^0:4 mmol=l; 71^29 pmol=l and 5^4 ng=ml: The study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of St Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital, and informed written consent was obtained prior to inclusion in the study.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O interesse em definir a sarcopenia iniciou--se por uma analogia ao IMC para encontrar o índice relativo de massa esquelética 62,63 . Usando modelos alométricos baseados em correlações empíricas, Heymisfield et al 63 mostraram que a composição corporal avaliada pela inclusão do músculo esquelético dimensionava a altura com o poder igual ou superior a 2, para a maioria dos grupos, segundo sexo e raça, daí a razão da criação de uma altura ao quadrado variável ajustada 63 . Assim, a sarcopenia é avaliada pela relação entre o Músculo Esquelético Apendicular (MEA) dividido pela altura ao quadrado (MEA/m²), definindo o índice relativo de massa muscular.…”
Section: Análise Da Massa Muscular Em Obesosunclassified
“…DPA operates by generating photons at two energy levels and then measuring the attenuation of photons as they pass through soft tissue and bone. These figures are then used to calculate body fat (for details see Heymsfield et al, 1990). UWW was chosen as the predictor (x) variable because it is generally accepted as a valid measure of fatness and for a long time was the standard in the field.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%