2021
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00489-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Plating in Distal Femur Fracture: A Systematic Review and Limited Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dual plating of distal femur fractures has gained more attention for preventing varus collapse and implant failure in comminuted metaphyseal and articular fractures. In a systematic review, satisfactory results were found for comminuted metaphyseal and articular fractures following dual plating, but no differences were found between single lateral plating and dual plating with regards to non-union rate, blood loss, functional outcomes, and complications, although dual plating led to faster fracture healing [ 23 ]. A large cohort series of 335 cases reviewed risk factors for failure of locked plate fixation in distal femur fractures and identified the following risk factors for reoperation to promote union and complications: open fracture, diabetes, smoking, increased body mass index, and shorter plate length [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual plating of distal femur fractures has gained more attention for preventing varus collapse and implant failure in comminuted metaphyseal and articular fractures. In a systematic review, satisfactory results were found for comminuted metaphyseal and articular fractures following dual plating, but no differences were found between single lateral plating and dual plating with regards to non-union rate, blood loss, functional outcomes, and complications, although dual plating led to faster fracture healing [ 23 ]. A large cohort series of 335 cases reviewed risk factors for failure of locked plate fixation in distal femur fractures and identified the following risk factors for reoperation to promote union and complications: open fracture, diabetes, smoking, increased body mass index, and shorter plate length [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual plating was proven by several investigators to provide superior stability by decreasing the lever arm acting on femoral axis thus lowering applied load on the fracture [21][22][23]. Also, stabilizing both columns and providing a stronger fixation in osteoporotic comminuted distal femur fractures [24]. In a recent biomechanical study, artificial femora simulating osteoporotic bone with fixed distal femoral fractures were subjected to axial, torsional, and quasistatic loading, and dual plating showed significantly lesser longitudinal and shear displacement than single plating [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Dual plate xation has been heralded as an alternative xation technique, however non-union and delayed union rates reach 12.5% and 33.3% respectively. 12 The nail-plate construct is a more recently described method for distal femur fractures, combining LP and IMN to provide biomechanically advantageous xation. This construct has the potential to reduce the risk of non-and mal-union and allows patients to mobilise immediately post-operatively without weightbearing restrictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%