2002
DOI: 10.1080/10618560290004026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method for Magnetohydrodynamic Flow Using Radial Basis Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, BEM have been applied for solving MHD duct flow, however several problems have risen from the difficulties of solving huge systems and high computational costs due to the domain discretization. Papers at [13][14][15][16][17] are representative studies on the BEM solutions of MHD duct flow problems. All these BEM solutions have been obtained for small and moderate values of Hartmann number (M ≤ 50).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, BEM have been applied for solving MHD duct flow, however several problems have risen from the difficulties of solving huge systems and high computational costs due to the domain discretization. Papers at [13][14][15][16][17] are representative studies on the BEM solutions of MHD duct flow problems. All these BEM solutions have been obtained for small and moderate values of Hartmann number (M ≤ 50).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sheu and Lin [73] presented the convection-diffusion-reaction model for solving unsteady MHD flow applying a finite difference method on non-staggered grids with a transport scheme in each ADI (predictor-corrector) spatial sweep. Sezgin and Han Aydın [86] used the fundamental solution of Laplace equation in the dual reciprocity boundary element method solution of uncoupled MHD equations and approximated convective terms with osculatory functions. Barrett [4] obtained solution for high values of Hartmann number by using finite element method and very fine mesh within the Hartmann layers, which is computationally very expensive, time and memory consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, the use of (BEM) based methods has been favored as a way to deal with the difficulties of managing large system sizes due to the need to increase domain discretization accuracy. Examples for Hartmann numbers of 1 ( 10 ) O  are given by Singh and Agarwal (1984), Tezer-Sezgin (1994), Liu and Zhu (2002), Tezer-Sezgin and Aydin (2002), Carabineanu et al (1995), and Bozkaya and . Particularly, Liu and Zhu (2002), and Bozkaya and Tezer-Sezgin (2008), applied a (BEM) based methodology variant referred as dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM) for non-conducting walls, and also another one referred as time-domain (BEM) for arbitrary wall conductivity unsteady MHD duct flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%