2017 Spokane, Washington July 16 - July 19, 2017 2017
DOI: 10.13031/aim.201700567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Robot Coordination for Apple Harvesting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Setiawan et al (2004) designed a low‐cost gripper and Kahya and Arin (2019) developed a pneumatic cutting tool to cut stems of apples. Davidson et al (2016, 2017) and Onishi et al (2019) used a three‐fingered gripper that encases the apple. For such a three‐fingered gripper J. Li et al (2016) tested the influence of different picking patterns on the detachment process of an apple during robotic harvesting.…”
Section: Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Setiawan et al (2004) designed a low‐cost gripper and Kahya and Arin (2019) developed a pneumatic cutting tool to cut stems of apples. Davidson et al (2016, 2017) and Onishi et al (2019) used a three‐fingered gripper that encases the apple. For such a three‐fingered gripper J. Li et al (2016) tested the influence of different picking patterns on the detachment process of an apple during robotic harvesting.…”
Section: Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some robotic apple harvesters were developed in research environments. Ceres et al (1998), Davidson et al (2016, 2017), and Onishi et al (2019) engineered and tested their concepts under controlled lab circumstances. Baeten et al (2008) and Silwal et al (2017) developed a picking robot for apples as well and validated its functionalities in field experiments.…”
Section: Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretical and applied research on robotic harvesting of fruits and vegetable are huge. Figure 5 shows some of the efforts that resulted in building actual robotic harvesting platforms, including (a) Harvey [28] : an autonomous mobile robot platform with UR5 manipulator for harvesting sweet peppers grown in greenhouses and other protect cultivation systems, (b) the CROPS harvesting platform for sweet pepper [27,171] , (c) the SWEEPER platform (developed by the Sweeper EU H2020 project consortium, www.sweeper-robot.eu) with a Fanuc LRMate 200iD robot manipulator (Fanuc America Corporation, Rochester Hills, MI) and a custom-built gripper and catching mechanism for sweet pepper harvesting, (d) the Energid robotic citrus picking system (Bedford, MA), (e) the citrus harvesting robot [48,49,155] developed at the University of Florida which uses a custom built gripper mounted on the Robotics Research manipulator model 1207 (Cincinnati, Ohio), (f) the DogTooth strawberry robot (Great Shelford, Cambridge, UK), (g) the Shibuya Seiki robot that can harvest strawberry fruits every 8 seconds, (h) a tomato harvesting robot from Suzhou Botian Automation Technology Co., Ltd (Jiangsu, Suzhou, China), (i) a cucumber harvesting robot developed at the Wageningen University and Research Center [35,38] , (j) an apple harvesting robot [172] with custom built manipulator mounted on top of a modified crawler mobile robot, (k) one of the first manipulators developed for the CROPS project [171] and modified for apple harvesting, (l) a linear actuator robotic system for apple picking developed by ffrobotics (Gesher HaEts 12, Israel), (m) a vacuum mechanism robot for apple picking from AbundantRobotics (Hayward, CA, USA), (n) the UR5 manipulator with a soft robotic universal gripper for apple harvesting developed at the University of Sydney, and, (n) an apple catching prototype robot [173][174][175] developed at the Wachington State University. Most of these projects have used eye-in-hand look-and-move configuration in their visual servo control.…”
Section: Harvesting Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, even if the fruit localization is accurate, and the robot control calculates an optimum trajectory to reach the fruit without receiving additional sensing feedback from the camera, the moment it enters into the dense plant canopy it disrupts the exact location of the target fruit. a. Harvey [28] b. CROPS [27,171] c. SWEEPER d. Energid citrus picking system e. Citrus robot [48,49,155] [35,38] j. Apple harvesting robot [172] www.dogtooth.tech shibuya-sss.co.jp szbotian.com.cn Wageningen UR k. Apple harvesting [178] l. Apple picker m. Apple picking vacuum n. UR5 apple robot o. Apple catching [173][174][175]…”
Section: Harvesting Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%