2021
DOI: 10.1051/meca/2021022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-rotor misalignment fault quantitative identification based on DBN and improved D-S evidence theory

Abstract: Misalignment fault is the main factor that affects the normal running of dual-rotor system. Quantitative identification the misalignment fault is an important way to ensure the safe and stable service of the dual-rotor system, while the identification accuracy of traditional methods is low. Aiming at the above problems, this paper proposed a dual-rotor misalignment fault quantitative identification method based on DBN and D-S evidence theory improved by mutual information measure (MIMD-S). Seven groups experim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al [26] established a dynamic model of the coupling misalignment of a dual-rotor system according to the Gibbons formula [27] and the Sekhar formula [28]. Yang et al [29] proposed a dual-rotor misalignment fault quantitative identification method based on DBN and D-S evidence theory improved using the mutual information method. The results showed that the method improved the accuracy of the misalignment fault quantitative identification of the dual rotor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [26] established a dynamic model of the coupling misalignment of a dual-rotor system according to the Gibbons formula [27] and the Sekhar formula [28]. Yang et al [29] proposed a dual-rotor misalignment fault quantitative identification method based on DBN and D-S evidence theory improved using the mutual information method. The results showed that the method improved the accuracy of the misalignment fault quantitative identification of the dual rotor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%