2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-season and full-polarimetric C band SAR assessment for vegetation mapping in the Amazon várzea wetlands

Abstract: This study answered the following questions: 1) Is polarimetric C-band SAR (PolSAR) more efficient than dualpolarization (dual-pol) C-band SAR for mapping várzea floodplain vegetation types, when using images of a single hydrological period? 2) Are single-season C-band PolSAR images more accurate for mapping várzea vegetation types than dual-season dual-pol C-band SAR images? 3) What are the most efficient polarimetric descriptors for mapping várzea vegetation types? We applied the Random Forests algorithm to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because cross-polarized observations are produced by volume scattering within the vegetation canopy and have a higher sensitivity to vegetation structures [55]. σ 0 HH is an ideal SAR observation for wetland mapping due to its sensitivity to double-bounce scattering over flooded vegetation [41,56]. Furthermore, σ 0 HH is less sensitive to the surface roughness compared to σ 0 VV , making the former advantageous for discriminating water and non-water classes.…”
Section: Sar Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because cross-polarized observations are produced by volume scattering within the vegetation canopy and have a higher sensitivity to vegetation structures [55]. σ 0 HH is an ideal SAR observation for wetland mapping due to its sensitivity to double-bounce scattering over flooded vegetation [41,56]. Furthermore, σ 0 HH is less sensitive to the surface roughness compared to σ 0 VV , making the former advantageous for discriminating water and non-water classes.…”
Section: Sar Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF can be tuned by adjusting two input parameters [70], namely the number of trees (Ntree), which is generated by randomly selecting samples from the training data, and the number of variables (Mtry), which is used for tree node splitting [71]. In this study, these parameters were selected based on (a) direction from previous studies (e.g., [56,69,72]) and (b) a trial-and-error approach. Specifically, Mtry was assessed for the following values (when Ntree was adjusted to 500): (a) One third of the total number of input features; (b) the square root of the total number of input features; (c) half of the total number of input features; (d) two thirds of the total number of input features; and (e) the total number of input features.…”
Section: Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isso é representado pelos valores de σ° de -7,75 db para terra com cobertura vegetal e -10,96 db para água. Nesta frequência estudada, existem estudos similares para mapear zonas úmidas vegetadas como aqueles de Furtado et al (2016) A acurácia temática do mapeamento das mudanças costeiras pode ser qualifi cada como razoável, com exatidão global de 48,54% e coefi ciente Kappa de 0,32, adotando-se como referência imagens TM/Landsat-5 e OLI/Landsat-8. O melhor desempenho ocorreu para feições de acresção, com acurácia do produtor igual a 79,49% (erro de omissão de 20,51%) e o pior desempenho foi para erosão, com acurácia do usuário de 41,89% (erro de comissão de 58,47%).…”
Section: Separabilidade E Acurácia Temáticaunclassified
“…With four polarimetric channels, the fully polarimetric SAR can obtain more abundant scattering information than the ordinary single polarimetric SAR data. Some researchers have applied this information in wetlands monitoring and proved the superiority of this kind of data [17][18][19]. Most current research uses only one polarimetric decomposition algorithm to extract the scattering information contained in PolSAR images [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%