2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8851765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-stream Self-Attentive Random Forest for False Information Detection

Abstract: The prevalence of online social media facilitates massive knowledge acquisition and sharing throughout the Web. Meanwhile, it inevitably poses the risk of generating and disseminating false information by both benign and malicious users. Despite there has been considerable research on false information detection from both the opinion-based and factbased perspectives, they mostly focus on tailored solutions for a particular domain and carry out limited work on leveraging multi-faceted clues such as textual cues… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies on detecting hoax news in Indonesia have been carried out with the use of word similarity measurement theories such as Levenshtein Distance [4]. In addition, research on hoax detection has also been applied using various classical machine learning methods such as K-Nearest Neighbor [5], Decision Tree [6], Naïve Bayes [7], Support Vector Machine [7], Random Forest [8], and so forth [9] [10]. However, the application of classical machine learning methods has weaknesses, including not suitable for processing large and complex data, requires an expert to label data and feature extraction manually, cannot learn based on raw data, and difficulty in representing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies on detecting hoax news in Indonesia have been carried out with the use of word similarity measurement theories such as Levenshtein Distance [4]. In addition, research on hoax detection has also been applied using various classical machine learning methods such as K-Nearest Neighbor [5], Decision Tree [6], Naïve Bayes [7], Support Vector Machine [7], Random Forest [8], and so forth [9] [10]. However, the application of classical machine learning methods has weaknesses, including not suitable for processing large and complex data, requires an expert to label data and feature extraction manually, cannot learn based on raw data, and difficulty in representing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algoritmos como K-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) (COVER; HART, 1967), Naïve Bayes (NB) (LANGLEY et al, 1992), e Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) (CHEN; GUESTRIN, 2016), também foram avaliados na detecção de notícias falsas COVÕES, 2020;KALIYAR et al, 2020;REDDY et al, 2020;KHANDELWAL;KUMAR, 2020;SINGH;GHOSH;SONAGARA, 2020;YAVARY;SAJEDI;ABADEH, 2020;ASGHAR et al, 2019;BHUTANI et al, 2019;DONG et al, 2019;MEHTA, 2019 Abordagens que propuseram novos algoritmos também se destacaram na literatura. Em SANTOS; PARDO (2020) foi criado um modelo que reproduz os passos de um usuário realizando uma busca no Google por uma notícia.…”
Section: Algoritmos De Aprendizado Baseados No Modelo Espaço-vetorialunclassified
“…Modelos de aprendizado baseados em redes neurais também foram amplamente propostos, usando técnicas como Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Deep Neural Networks, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) e Transformers para detecção de notícias falsas (CAPUANO et al, 2023;KALIYAR et al, 2020;KANG;HWANG;QAZI;ALI, 2020;WANG et al, 2020;WU et al, 2020a;YAVARY;SAJEDI;ABADEH, 2020;BONDIELLI;MARCELLONI, 2019;MEEL;VISHWAKARMA, 2019;SHARMA et al, 2019;DONG et al, 2019;MONTI et al, 2019;PHILIP, 2019;LI et al, 2019).…”
Section: Algoritmos De Aprendizado Baseados No Modelo Espaço-vetorialunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation