2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Synthetic Receptor-Based Sandwich Electrochemical Sensor for Highly Selective and Ultrasensitive Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria at the Single-Cell Level

Abstract: Sensitive and rapid detection of pathogenic bacteria is essential for effective source control and prevention of microbial infectious diseases. However, it remains a substantial challenge to rapidly detect bacteria at the single-cell level. Herein, we present an electrochemical sandwich sensor for highly selective and ultrasensitive detection of a single bacterial cell based on dual recognition by the bacteria-imprinted polymer film (BIF) and aptamer. The BIF was used as the capture probe, which was in situ fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacteria have posed a significant threat to the public health security of human society throughout their development. , With the overuse of antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria have emerged that can even decompose and actively eliminate drugs, posing a significant challenge to the clinical treatment of these pathogens. , Among them, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) exhibits multiresistance to a plethora of antibiotics, rendering the treatment of MRSA infection as one of the most complex dilemmas. , The conventional techniques for bacterial detection, such as culture counting and PCR, often necessitate prolonged incubation periods and the use of sophisticated equipment, thereby imposing limitations on their clinical applicability . Therefore, the development of reliable MRSA detection methods is essential for the timely implementation of effective infection control measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacteria have posed a significant threat to the public health security of human society throughout their development. , With the overuse of antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria have emerged that can even decompose and actively eliminate drugs, posing a significant challenge to the clinical treatment of these pathogens. , Among them, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) exhibits multiresistance to a plethora of antibiotics, rendering the treatment of MRSA infection as one of the most complex dilemmas. , The conventional techniques for bacterial detection, such as culture counting and PCR, often necessitate prolonged incubation periods and the use of sophisticated equipment, thereby imposing limitations on their clinical applicability . Therefore, the development of reliable MRSA detection methods is essential for the timely implementation of effective infection control measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used bacterial identification techniques include plate culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), gene chip, second-generation sequencing technology, immunological detection, etc. 2,3 Each of these methods has its own advantages, but they cannot be unified in terms of flexibility, ease of operation, accuracy, and low cost. 4−6 Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is a phenomenon in which when an electromagnetic field on the surface of a precious metal-enhanced substrate is placed close to nanoparticles (NPs) such as gold and silver, it significantly amplifies the intrinsic molecular vibrational fingerprint (i.e., Raman spectrum) of the detected object.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In routine food inspection, accurate and sensitive detection of pathogenic microbial contamination is essential. Commonly used bacterial identification techniques include plate culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), gene chip, second-generation sequencing technology, immunological detection, etc. , Each of these methods has its own advantages, but they cannot be unified in terms of flexibility, ease of operation, accuracy, and low cost. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemical biosensors are particularly useful in fields where on-site inspection is required because of their high sensitivity, rapid measurement, and ease of device miniaturization. Generally, biosensors use electrochemical reporters as labels to obtain electrochemical signals. These electrochemical reporters include ferrocene, methylene blue, enzymes (e.g., horseradish peroxidase and glucose oxidase), and metal complexes (e.g., ruthenium and osmium complexes). More recently, many new detection principles have been developed to improve specificity, sensitivity, and simplicity and enable rapid detection. In particular, metal nanoparticles have been used in biosensor design owing to their characteristic surface effects and catalytic functions. However, it is necessary to separate electrochemical cells for different labels or to fabricate a multiarray of electrodes that is selective for bacterial species when multiple bacterial species need to be detected simultaneously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%