2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-task and electrophysiological markers of executive cognitive processing in older adult gait and fall-risk

Abstract: The role of cognition is becoming increasingly central to our understanding of the complexity of walking gait. In particular, higher-level executive functions are suggested to play a key role in gait and fall-risk, but the specific underlying neurocognitive processes remain unclear. Here, we report two experiments which investigated the cognitive and neural processes underlying older adult gait and falls. Experiment 1 employed a dual-task (DT) paradigm in young and older adults, to assess the relative effects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
34
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the resulting dual-task interference is greater than that related to a cognitive concomitant task, and performance decrements in both motor tasks are more pronounced. However, these results contrast with Walshe et al's (2015) report of higher DTCs for a concurrent task involving EF (relative to a nonexecutive motor task) [100]. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the difference in impact between a motor and a cognitive concurrent task because (i) the tasks' level of complexity and novelty influences the DTCs and biases the comparison, and (ii) motor tasks always feature a cognitive component to some extent.…”
Section: Gaitmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Consequently, the resulting dual-task interference is greater than that related to a cognitive concomitant task, and performance decrements in both motor tasks are more pronounced. However, these results contrast with Walshe et al's (2015) report of higher DTCs for a concurrent task involving EF (relative to a nonexecutive motor task) [100]. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the difference in impact between a motor and a cognitive concurrent task because (i) the tasks' level of complexity and novelty influences the DTCs and biases the comparison, and (ii) motor tasks always feature a cognitive component to some extent.…”
Section: Gaitmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Recently, Walshe et al [22] reported a larger negative effect of dual tasking on gait, but even more so when the cognitive task targeted the executive functions. In their study, gait in both young and older adults was affected, but with a larger effect in older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reciting the alphabet) [20, 22, 40]. Both cognitive tasks performed in this study are considered to rely mainly on the executive functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, certain types of dual-task combinations can increase the dual-task interference (Fraser and Bherer, 2013). In particular cognitive tasks that are more executive in nature seem to interfere more with gait (Al-Yahya et al, 2011; Buracchio et al, 2011; Walshe et al, 2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis found that cognitive tasks with “mental tracking” (pg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%