Dual-Task Effects on Story Retell for Participants With Moderate, Mild, or No Aphasia: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings

Abstract

Purpose The aims of the study were to determine dual-task effects on content accuracy, delivery speed, and perceived effort during narrative discourse in people with moderate, mild, or no aphasia and to explore subjective reactions to retelling a story with a concurrent task. Method Two studies (1 quantitative and 1 qualitative) were conducted. In Study 1, participants with mild or moderate aphasia and neurotypical controls retold short stories in isolation and while simultaneously distinguishing between high and low tones. Story retell accuracy (speech productivity and efficiency), speed (speech rate, repetitions, and pauses), and perceived effort were measured and compared. In Study 2, participants completed semistructured interviews about their story retell experience. These interviews were recorded, transcribed orthographically, and coded qualitatively using thematic analysis. Results The dual task interfered more with spoken language of people with aphasia than controls, but different speed–accuracy trade-off patterns were noted. Participants in the moderate aphasia group reduced accuracy with little alteration to speed, whereas participants in the mild aphasia group maintained accuracy and reduced their speed. Participants in both groups also reported more negative emotional and behavioral reactions to the dual-task condition than their neurotypical peers. Intentional strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of the dual-task condition were only reported by participants with mild aphasia. Conclusion The findings suggest that, although communicating with a competing task is more difficult for people with aphasia than neurotypical controls, participants with mild aphasia may be better able to cope with cognitively demanding communication situations than participants with moderate aphasia. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8233391

Language processing in glioma patients: speed or accuracy as a sensitive measure?

“…This entails the integration of a range of different abilities, which may be challenging for individuals with aphasia. For example, they have been shown to experience more difficulties with language production on a story retelling task, when they have to perform another task simultaneously (Harmon et al, 2019). Apart from linguistically meaningful and grammatically correct output, other cognitive functions, attention and executive functioning in particular, have been shown to play a crucial role in the successful everyday communication of aphasic speakers (Fridriksson et al, 2006;Olsson et al, 2019).…”

How Responsiveness From a Communication Partner Affects Story Retell in Aphasia: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings

“…An eclectic coding process combined structural, descriptive, emotion, and magnitude coding strategies (Saldaña, 2013). All authors discussed and agreed upon the analytic approach prior to coding, which followed the same five-step iterative process described previously (Harmon, Jacks, Haley, & Bailliard, 2019). First, the first author and a graduate student research assistant read through all transcripts.…”

Understanding and Addressing the Individualized Emotional Impact of Aphasia: A Framework for Speech-Language Pathologists

“…For this reason, it is recommended that, when drawing upon emotional stimuli or situations in therapy, SLPs evaluate the individual's perceived response. This could be done with specific tools such as the Simple Aphasia Stress Scale (Laures-Gore & Rice 2019) or asking open-ended questions about the emotional reactions of the person with aphasia (see Harmon et al 2019Harmon et al , 2020, for examples of how my research teams have done this using semistructured interviews). Additionally, gradually upping the ante on environmental demands to help PWA prepare for more complex everyday communication environments might allow them to maintain optimism while simultaneously experiencing growth and challenge.…”