2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-threshold Time-over-Threshold nonlinearity correction for PET detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at the time of the measurements this procedure was not implemented in the scanner and a global correction was deemed sufficient. Further investigations to recalibrate the scanner using more advanced non-linearity correction (Gaudin et al 2020) are expected to reduce this discrepancy. Finally, the coincidence processor rejects all triple or higher order coincidences that cannot be assigned a single unambiguous LOR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, at the time of the measurements this procedure was not implemented in the scanner and a global correction was deemed sufficient. Further investigations to recalibrate the scanner using more advanced non-linearity correction (Gaudin et al 2020) are expected to reduce this discrepancy. Finally, the coincidence processor rejects all triple or higher order coincidences that cannot be assigned a single unambiguous LOR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An automated procedure seeking the APD breakdown voltage while monitoring the signal baseline was used to operate the detector arrays at optimal bias maximizing the signal/noise ratio. The inherent non-linearity of the ToT signal (Orita et al 2011) was corrected using average corrections factors based on an energy calibration procedure using a single γ-ray source and a variation of the ASIC internal electronic gain (Gaudin et al 2020). Unless otherwise stated, measurements were performed using an effective energy window of 350-650 keV and a coincidence time window of 10 ns.…”
Section: System Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two commonly used charge measurement methods in PET electronics, namely direct digitization through an ADC chip [15] with digital peak detection or integration, and time-overthreshold (TOT) with TDC digitization [16]. Several FPGA-based measurement methods have also been proposed on the basis of these two methods [24,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%