2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0631-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Tracer PET Using Generalized Factor Analysis of Dynamic Sequences

Abstract: Purpose With single-photon emission computed tomography, simultaneous imaging of two physiological processes relies on discrimination of the energy of the emitted gamma rays, whereas the application of dual-tracer imaging to positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has been limited by the characteristic 511-keV emissions. Procedures To address this limitation, we developed a novel approach based on generalized factor analysis of dynamic sequences (GFADS) that exploits spatio-temporal differences between ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one must be cautious that in some studies, components may not be fully separated, leading to problems especially for quantitative applications. Alternatively, it is possible to apply other non-compartmental methods to dynamic images and TACs such as independent component analysis (ICA) [141,142], factor analysis [143][144][145][146], spectral analysis [147,148], cluster analysis [149] or heterogeneity analysis (e.g., fractal dimension) [38]. It remains to be demonstrated whether these methods, given their subtleties and challenges (such as the challenge of accurately mapping their derived images to specific physiological processes) will translate to clinical applications.…”
Section: Non-compartmental Analysis Of Dwb Pet Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one must be cautious that in some studies, components may not be fully separated, leading to problems especially for quantitative applications. Alternatively, it is possible to apply other non-compartmental methods to dynamic images and TACs such as independent component analysis (ICA) [141,142], factor analysis [143][144][145][146], spectral analysis [147,148], cluster analysis [149] or heterogeneity analysis (e.g., fractal dimension) [38]. It remains to be demonstrated whether these methods, given their subtleties and challenges (such as the challenge of accurately mapping their derived images to specific physiological processes) will translate to clinical applications.…”
Section: Non-compartmental Analysis Of Dwb Pet Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique is based on distinguishing between different photon energies and will not work in standard PET imaging because all annihilation photons resulting from positron annihilation have the same energy (Figure 1). To overcome this limitation, alternative techniques have been proposed, including the following: simultaneous injection of or sequential close-in-time injections of two radiotracers that do not interfere with each other (92);dynamic imaging of timed injections followed by constrained kinetic modeling to separate the particular dynamics of each radiotracer (93) using generalized factor analysis of the dynamic sequences (94); orthe use of a combination of radiotracers, one of which emits an additional photon simultaneously with the annihilation photons. The two radiotracers can be differentiated by measuring the energy of the third photon (which has to be different from 511 keV) (95).…”
Section: Application Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dynamic imaging of timed injections followed by constrained kinetic modeling to separate the particular dynamics of each radiotracer (93) using generalized factor analysis of the dynamic sequences (94); or…”
Section: Application Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the photon energies cannot be separated, separation must typically be performed in time, applying and imaging the tracers in sequence rather than simultaneously (although some research papers have explored other ways of signal separation [6]). The waiting time between the imaging of two tracers should preferably be long enough so that the first tracer has decayed to an insignificant level by the time the second tracer is imaged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%