Dual transcranial direct current stimulation for subacute stroke patients with compromised corticospinal integrity: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study

Hsu, Shih‐Pin; Lu, Chia‐Feng; Tang, Chih‐Wei; Lin, Bing‐Fong; Kuo, I-Ju; Tsai, Yun-An; Lee, Po-Lei; Lee, I‐Hui

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.10.366

Brain Stimulation

2021

DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.10.366

|View full text |Cite

Dual transcranial direct current stimulation for subacute stroke patients with compromised corticospinal integrity: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study

Shih‐Pin Hsu¹,

Chia‐Feng Lu²,

Chih‐Wei Tang³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Effect of Dual‐Site Non‐Invasive Brain Stimulation on Upper‐Limb Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Ren,

Xu,

Wang

et al. 2024

Brain and Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundNon‐invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has attracted significant attention as it has been proven to be effective in facilitating upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke. This meta‐analysis evaluates the efficacy of dual‐site non‐invasive brain stimulation (DS‐NIBS) in improving upper extremity motor function after stroke.MethodsA PRISMA systematic search was conducted for randomized controlled trials. Two authors independently extracted data, and the quality of included studies was assessed.ResultsTen studies were included in the current review. DS‐NIBS demonstrated a significant effect on upper extremity motor function impairment. However, only two studies showed no clear effects of DS‐tDCS on upper extremity motor function after stroke. Due to the limited number of studies, the effects of DS‐NIBS remain inconclusive.FindingThis review found evidence for the relatively higher efficacy of DS‐NIBS on post‐stroke upper extremity motor function impairment, compared to the sham and SS‐NIBS. Additionally, DS‐TMS was found to generate better improvement than DS‐tDCS.

show abstract

Effect of Dual‐Site Non‐Invasive Brain Stimulation on Upper‐Limb Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Ren,

Xu,

Wang

et al. 2024

Brain and Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Dual transcranial direct current stimulation for subacute stroke patients with compromised corticospinal integrity: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Effect of Dual‐Site Non‐Invasive Brain Stimulation on Upper‐Limb Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Effect of Dual‐Site Non‐Invasive Brain Stimulation on Upper‐Limb Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About