2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40592-015-0026-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues

Abstract: Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This account, however, neglects important social aspects of the use of science and technology. In this paper, I supplement existing conceptions of dual-use potential to account for the social context of dual-use research. This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Viruses cause the most feared and devastating human diseases, their ability to spread rapidly making them major contributors to global infectious disease morbidity and mortality . In addition, a number of viruses have a dual use as biological weapons and tools of mass destruction . As the world celebrates four decades of smallpox eradication, Nigeria began to experience a recent outbreak of severe skin rash syndrome that mimics a form of varicella zoster and smallpox, with monkeypox virus (MPXV) being the etiologic agent …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viruses cause the most feared and devastating human diseases, their ability to spread rapidly making them major contributors to global infectious disease morbidity and mortality . In addition, a number of viruses have a dual use as biological weapons and tools of mass destruction . As the world celebrates four decades of smallpox eradication, Nigeria began to experience a recent outbreak of severe skin rash syndrome that mimics a form of varicella zoster and smallpox, with monkeypox virus (MPXV) being the etiologic agent …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dual‐use view is often adopted when discussing the promises and risks of the DIYBM. On a fundamental level, the DIYBM is a risk because it increases the dual‐use risk and the risk for unintended negative consequences since it increases the probability of accidents by practitioners with no biosafety training “manipulating organisms in their homes” and possibly pursuing “reckless projects” (Gómez‐Tatay & Hernández‐Andreu, , p. 26) without “regulatory devices such as professional codes, export controls, or classification” (Evans, , p. 272). However, Jefferson, Lentzos, and Marris () argue that current advances in DNA synthesis are far from enabling the DIYBM to be a real risk for biosecurity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value, distribution, and use of a particular platform technology is not guaranteed. Novel technologies to combat infectious disease are insufficient solutions if a significant portion of the population has no access to the most basic public health and healthcare infrastructure ( Evans, 2014 ). Platform technologies may or may not be fully distributed, and there may be restrictions on where they can operate; for example, if plant-based production systems have a limited climate in which they can be grown, or require significant resources to cultivate.…”
Section: Issues Most Relevant In the Longer Term (>10 Years)mentioning
confidence: 99%