2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual vs single antiplatelet therapy in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease – A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, also the intake of antiplatelet drugs might have influenced VCAM-1 levels. Antiplatelet therapy is recommended in all patients with symptomatic PAD [ 9 , 37 , 38 ]; however, in subclinical PAD, the usefulness and clinical benefit for patients remain elusive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, also the intake of antiplatelet drugs might have influenced VCAM-1 levels. Antiplatelet therapy is recommended in all patients with symptomatic PAD [ 9 , 37 , 38 ]; however, in subclinical PAD, the usefulness and clinical benefit for patients remain elusive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various aspects of antiplatelet treatment in PAD, from the pathophysiology of thrombosis to the choice of antithrombotic regimen following peripheral revascularisation, were most recently reviewed in a Special Issue of this journal [ 59 - 61 ]. Previous meta-analyses reviewed the therapeutic evidence of antiplatelets for PAD [ 62 ], and compared antiplatelet therapies using pairwise meta-analyses in patients with claudication [ 63 ] or performed NMA in the overall PAD population [ 64 ]. However, the latter analysis also involved asymptomatic PAD patients and did not include the latest evidence ( e.g .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, DAPT with clopidogrel and aspirin carries a higher risk of overall bleeding events compared with aspirin and with picotamide monotherapy. These findings contradict those of the meta-analysis by Navarese et al ., comparing a pool of different DAPT regimens vs single antiplatelet therapy; in this study, DAPT significantly reduces mortality compared with single antiplatelet therapy, without increasing bleeding complications [ 62 ]. However, this meta-analysis has major limitations; firstly, the results are driven by non-adjusted estimates from 2 retrospective studies contributing 92.8% of the population, while relevant trials such as CASPAR [ 29 ] were not included; secondly, 93% of the patients had undergone a recent peripheral revascularisation, limiting the applicability of findings to the wider population of symptomatic PAD; thirdly, none of the studies included was an RCT of DAPT vs single antiplatelet therapy, with DAPT indication being unclear and its duration varying from 3 days to 60 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the current guidelines DAPT with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin is recommended for 12 months to reduce adverse thrombotic events [10,12,19,20]. DAPT can be modified, its duration can be shortened or extended depending on the patient's ischemic and bleeding risk, the occurrence of adverse events, comorbidities, co-medications, and drugs availability [12].…”
Section: Wacław Kochamn 1 Salvatore DI Sommamentioning
confidence: 99%