2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00216-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dualised σ-models at the two-loop order

Abstract: We adress ourselves the question of the quantum equivalence of non abelian dualised σ-models on the simple example of the T-dualised SU (2) σ-model. This theory is classically canonically equivalent to the standard chiral SU (2) σ-model. It is known that the equivalence also holds at the first order in perturbations with the same β functions. However, this model has been claimed to be non-renormalisable at the two-loop order. The aim of the present work is the proof that it is -at least up to this order -still… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from its form as a deformation of the G/G gWZW model, we will determine the 1-loop correction that comes from integrating out the 2d gauge field A a and confirm that this solves the 2-loop RG equation (1.2), (1.3). Since the non-abelian dual of S 2 is a limit of the λ-model, our result implies that accounting for the determinant contribution in (1.7) should also resolve past problems [41,42,43,44] in verifying that the non-abelian duality commutes with RG flow at the 2-loop level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starting from its form as a deformation of the G/G gWZW model, we will determine the 1-loop correction that comes from integrating out the 2d gauge field A a and confirm that this solves the 2-loop RG equation (1.2), (1.3). Since the non-abelian dual of S 2 is a limit of the λ-model, our result implies that accounting for the determinant contribution in (1.7) should also resolve past problems [41,42,43,44] in verifying that the non-abelian duality commutes with RG flow at the 2-loop level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In this way, we have identified how earlier problems checking NAD at 2-loop level [41,42,43,44] should be resolved in general. In particular, as for abelian T-duality, NAD (properly modified by quantum α corrections) should also be a symmetry of the σ-model β-functions or the string effective action to all orders in α .…”
Section: λ-Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I thank P. Forgács for pointing this out. A similar concept of recovering renormalizability by finite quantum deformations was recently employed in the context of T-duality[48]; see also[49].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The problem of higher loop corrections to the Poisson-Lie T-duality appears to be more tricky than in the case of the Abelian or traditional non-Abelian T-duality. Of course, one problem to cope with is the fact that a finite one-loop renormalization can change the twoloops divergences [17]. But there is also a structural aspect of the thing: we expect that the two-loops effective action of the model should not probably have the same structure as the classical action (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%