2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duality and products in algebraic (co)homology theories

Abstract: The origin and interplay of products and dualities in algebraic\ud (co)homology theories is ascribed to a ×_A-Hopf algebra structure\ud on the relevant universal enveloping algebra. This provides a unified\ud treatment for example of results by Van den Bergh about\ud Hochschild (co)homology and by Huebschmann about Lie–Rinehart\ud (co)homology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is known for the following classes of algebras that H ‚ pA, Aq does indeed admit the structure of a BV algebra: -symmetric algebras [Tr,Me1]; -Frobenius algebras with semisimple Nakayama automorphism [LaZhZi, Vo]; -Calabi-Yau algebras [Gi]; -twisted Calabi-Yau algebras [KoKr3], and probably more. These results were obtained by various different approaches, for example, those in [Gi,KoKr3,LaZhZi] by passing through a sort of Poincaré duality [VdB,La,KoKr1] and using the notion of noncommutative differential calculus [TaTs], or more precisely, the notion of a BV module structure on the respective Hochschild homology H ‚ pA, Aq, see also [Ko2] for a generalised treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is known for the following classes of algebras that H ‚ pA, Aq does indeed admit the structure of a BV algebra: -symmetric algebras [Tr,Me1]; -Frobenius algebras with semisimple Nakayama automorphism [LaZhZi, Vo]; -Calabi-Yau algebras [Gi]; -twisted Calabi-Yau algebras [KoKr3], and probably more. These results were obtained by various different approaches, for example, those in [Gi,KoKr3,LaZhZi] by passing through a sort of Poincaré duality [VdB,La,KoKr1] and using the notion of noncommutative differential calculus [TaTs], or more precisely, the notion of a BV module structure on the respective Hochschild homology H ‚ pA, Aq, see also [Ko2] for a generalised treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We realised subsequently [15] that the coefficients σ A also arise from Poincaré duality in Hochschild (co)homology: using the general theory of Van den Bergh [32] we showed that is the fundamental class in Hochschild homology, that is, it corresponds under (2) to 1 ∈ H 0 (A, A) (identified with the centre of A), and (2) is given by · dA [21]. A cycle in the standard Hochschild complex C • (A, σ q −2 ,1 A) = A ⊗•+1 representing dA is given explicitly in (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. In a similar fashion, Kowalzig and Krahmer proved in [12] that the cohomology is concentrated in the subcomplex corresponding to the eigenvalue 1, namely…”
Section: Artin-schelter Regular Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…[12], Theorem 1; [13] Theorem 1.5). Let ∪ 1 , ∩ 1 and {−, −} 1 be the restrictions of the cup product, cap product and Gerstenhaber bracket to the homology and cohomology spaces associated with the eigenvalue λ = 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%