1993
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(93)90077-k
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duane's retraction syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
151
4
14

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
14
151
4
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In our group of patients there was a male preponderance among type I and type II Duane while there was a female preponderance among type III. Like other reports left eye was more commonly affected [3,8,11,12] and 114 patients (58%) had involvement of left eye; 56 patients (28%) had involvement of the right eye; and 28 patients (14%) had involvement of both eyes. The ages of the patients ranged from 6 months to 44 years (mean 10.4 years).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In our group of patients there was a male preponderance among type I and type II Duane while there was a female preponderance among type III. Like other reports left eye was more commonly affected [3,8,11,12] and 114 patients (58%) had involvement of left eye; 56 patients (28%) had involvement of the right eye; and 28 patients (14%) had involvement of both eyes. The ages of the patients ranged from 6 months to 44 years (mean 10.4 years).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Duane retraction syndrome (DRS) is a spectrum of congenital ocular motility disorders characterized by limitation of horizontal duction associated with globe retraction [1][2][3] and consequent narrowing of the palpebral fissure in adduction. 4 DRS is caused by dysinnervation of the extraocular muscles (EOMs) by branches of the oculomotor nerve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRUS-2 is caused by mutation on chromosome 2q31. It has an AD inheritance pattern [24,25]. Our patient with FXII deficiency had DRUS2, facial dysmorphism, and extremity abnormality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%