2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000601)88:11<2495::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ductal lesions in patients with chronic pancreatitis show K-ras mutations in a frequency similar to that in the normal pancreas and lack nuclear immunoreactivity for p53

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three studies have reported a higher specificity of serum KRAS2 mutations compared to the current study (100 vs 87%), but their control groups included few patients and essentially healthy subjects (Mulcahy et al, 1998;Porta et al, 1999;Theodor et al, 2000). Since KRAS2 mutations have been reported in pancreatic tissue or juice from 6 -42% of patients with chronic pancreatitis (Furuya et al, 1997;Mulligan et al, 1999;Lüttges et al, 2000;Ha et al, 2001), and knowing that a part of this mutated DNA can be released into circulation (Yamada et al, 1998), the control group should include patients with chronic pancreatitis. In the series published by Castells et al (1999) with the largest control group (including patients with chronic pancreatitis), specificity was comparable (94%) to the present study, and increased in the presence of a pancreatic mass.…”
Section: Molecular and Cellular Pathologymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Three studies have reported a higher specificity of serum KRAS2 mutations compared to the current study (100 vs 87%), but their control groups included few patients and essentially healthy subjects (Mulcahy et al, 1998;Porta et al, 1999;Theodor et al, 2000). Since KRAS2 mutations have been reported in pancreatic tissue or juice from 6 -42% of patients with chronic pancreatitis (Furuya et al, 1997;Mulligan et al, 1999;Lüttges et al, 2000;Ha et al, 2001), and knowing that a part of this mutated DNA can be released into circulation (Yamada et al, 1998), the control group should include patients with chronic pancreatitis. In the series published by Castells et al (1999) with the largest control group (including patients with chronic pancreatitis), specificity was comparable (94%) to the present study, and increased in the presence of a pancreatic mass.…”
Section: Molecular and Cellular Pathologymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Non-specific cytoplasmic staining with either CEA or CA19-9 has previously been demonstrated in both the normal and inflamed pancreatic ductal epithelium [35][36][37] . Performance was poor for all the markers when used as indicators for the absence of malignancy (alone or in various parallel combinations of up to four markers) as demonstrated by low NPVs and non-significant NLRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median percentage of total, visceral, and SFA (regarding the total surface of the slide) represented: 21% (2-47), 7.3% (0. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and 13% (1.2-31.7), respectively. Liver steatosis was observed in 27%.…”
Section: Radiologic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%