2020
DOI: 10.4271/03-13-05-0044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ducted Fuel Injection vs. Free-Spray Injection: A Study of Mixing and Entrainment Effects Using Numerical Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 The spray modeling approach for DFI numerical validations is adopted from the literature. 19,32,33 The Amsden model was utilized to simulate the heat transfer to the walls of the combustion chamber and the duct (for DFI cases). 34 This model was selected due to its reliability and several studies have proven how this model effectively mimics experimental results for applications similar to this study.…”
Section: Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The spray modeling approach for DFI numerical validations is adopted from the literature. 19,32,33 The Amsden model was utilized to simulate the heat transfer to the walls of the combustion chamber and the duct (for DFI cases). 34 This model was selected due to its reliability and several studies have proven how this model effectively mimics experimental results for applications similar to this study.…”
Section: Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to mixing, another important and related physical behavior for DFI is the entrainment of charge gas into the fuel spray, which has been investigated in different studies. Studies by Millo et al, 13 Nilsen et al, 14 and Zhang et al 11 have shown enhanced levels of entrainment at the duct inlet compared to an unconfined free spray, which is attributed to the higher axial velocities and associated lower pressure within the duct interior. The low-pressure region within the duct then draws in fluid at the inlet to drive the increased entrainment; the phenomenon has been termed as a ''jet-pump'' effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on early successes, multiple research groups have begun to investigate DFI both experimentally 1,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and computationally. 7,19,[22][23][24][25][26][27] A number of studies have investigated the impact of duct geometry on DFI combustion in pressure vessels [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]18,26 and engines. [14][15][16][17]19,20,28 Figure 1 shows important geometric parameters in DFI, including the duct inlet and exit shape, the duct inner diameter (D), the duct length (L), and the gap distance between the injector orifice and the duct inlet (G).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have found that there is limited effect on air entrainment into the spray upstream of the duct, 19 yet others have found that DFI significantly increases entrainment upstream of the duct. 13,24 This increase in potential entrainment is attributed to a low-pressure region at the entrance of the duct that drives flow into the duct. 24,26 Segatori 26 showed that the low-pressure region might be up to 10 bar below ambient pressures and that the annular region between the spray and the duct inner wall corresponds to the minimum pressure zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation