2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ductile moment-resisting frames using cold-formed steel sections: An analytical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their structural performance and mathematical modelling for the prediction of their inelastic behaviours were also verified and validated by Uang and Sato [4,5]. Sabbagh et al studied configurations of double-channel beams and the reinforcement effects by testing and using numerical simulations to increase their strength and ductility [6][7][8]. Serror et al conducted full-scale testing of built-up beams with bolted connections for comparison with the numerical simulation results [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Their structural performance and mathematical modelling for the prediction of their inelastic behaviours were also verified and validated by Uang and Sato [4,5]. Sabbagh et al studied configurations of double-channel beams and the reinforcement effects by testing and using numerical simulations to increase their strength and ductility [6][7][8]. Serror et al conducted full-scale testing of built-up beams with bolted connections for comparison with the numerical simulation results [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The linear S4R shell element was employed for all the steel sections having 4 nodes each with 6 translational and rotational degrees of freedom and reduced integration, while the RuC infill has been modelled using the 8-node reduced integration C3D8R brick element with three translational degrees of freedom per node. A mesh size of 20 mm × 20 mm was chosen for the beam and column steel channels, which has been shown [7][8][9] to capture the load-deformation response of CFS connections with high accuracy, while a coarser mesh size of 50 mm × 50 mm was chosen for the RuC infill. A bi-linear stress-strain curve has been utilised for all the steel components with the nominal yielding strength and modulus of elasticity same as those used at the design stage (see Section 2), and with a strain hardening second modulus ratio of E / Es = 0.01.…”
Section: Fe Modelling Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel with the stud-wall LSF systems, a framed moment-resisting (MR) type of LSF systems have also been developed by Uang and Sato [6] featuring CFS channel beams bolted to both sides of hollow section columns, with the application limited to single-storey structures. More recently, a rigid moment-resisting CFS beam-to-column connection has been developed by the first author [7][8][9][10][11] through a set of physical tests and finite element (FE) analyses suitable for multi-storey building structures in seismic areas. Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts were made to increase the lightweight section ductility by stiffening flange parts from flat to curves, combined with an out-of-plane stiffener placed on the beam web [7,8]. The connections are a significant part of the structure and act to distribute the load to each member of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%