Duelling Honors: Power, Identity and the Russia-Georgia Divide

Abstract

The paper explores a shift from engagement to confrontation in Russia’s policy toward Georgia since the Rose Revolution. In addition to emphasizing power and security as explanations of Russia’s behavior, the paper focuses on considerations of honor and prestige. The latter are relational and a product of Russia’s perception of its ties with Western nations. Honor also plays a crucial role in Georgia’s attitude toward its northern neighbor, and the entire Caucasus area emerges as a battleground for symbolic attributes of power among larger states with capabilities to influence the region. The case of Russia–Georgia divide is important for demonstrating benefits and limitations of traditional foreign policy explanations and for learning possible ways to de‐escalate dangerous bilateral conflicts.

Russian Foreign Policy and the Shaping of a ‘Greater Europe’

“…5 . See for example Tsygankov and Tarver-Vahlquist (2009); Kanet and Freire (2012); Averre (2007) . 6 .…”

Russian foreign policy in the making: The linkage between internal dynamics and the external context

“…Moreover, the events of summer 2008 took place in an international context of friction, as mentioned, which remains central to their understanding, particularly with the discussion about NATO enlargement to Ukraine and Georgia profoundly irritating the Russian authorities. Developments at the international level, with their implications that pressured domestic politics not to simply follow the events, but to react to them, built into an issue of honour related to an empowered definition of the self (See Tsygankov and Tarver-Vahlquist, 2009;Heller, 2012).…”

Shaping the Neighbourhood? The EU's Impact on Georgia

“…Finally, US pressures have put a halt to intentions of transiting Iranian gas through Georgia towards the Russian grid (Kandiyoti 2008). Before the 2008 war, tensions between the Saakashvili and Putin administrations reached their lowest point in 2006 (Tsygankov & Tarver-Wahlquist 2009), and Russia's influence in the energy sector has weakened since then. Likewise, the entrance of Russian state-owned United Energy System (UES) into the Georgian electricity market in 2003 also raised US concerns, but the geopolitical implications of such a move are less important.…”