1974
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1974.55.419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dugundji extension theorems for linearly ordered spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us remark that if K is a closed subset of a linearly ordered compact space L, then there is a regular extension operator E : C(K) → C(L), cf. [17]. Using this fact one can easily deduce Theorem 8.2 from Theorem 8.7, Lemma 8.6, Remark 2.5 and Proposition 2.6.…”
Section: Countable Discrete Extensions Of Dyadic Compactamentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Let us remark that if K is a closed subset of a linearly ordered compact space L, then there is a regular extension operator E : C(K) → C(L), cf. [17]. Using this fact one can easily deduce Theorem 8.2 from Theorem 8.7, Lemma 8.6, Remark 2.5 and Proposition 2.6.…”
Section: Countable Discrete Extensions Of Dyadic Compactamentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Now it is known that Dugundji's extension theorem holds in some classes of generalized metric spaces X (C. J. R. Borges [3], I. S. Stares [11]), but does not hold for all GO-spaces X. Indeed, for the Michael line R Q , R. W. Heath and D. J. Lutzer [9] show that there exists no linear conv-extender u : C(Q) → C(R Q ); E. K. van Douwen [5] extends it by showing that there is no monotone extender u : C(Q) → C(R Q ) (see also I. S. Stares and J. E. Vaughan [12]). For related results on Dugundji extenders and retracts in GO-spaces, see G. Gruenhage, Y. Hattori and H. Ohta [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On extenders for bounded functions, R. W. Heath and D. J. Lutzer [9] establish that for a closed subset A of a GO-space X, there exists a linear conv-extender u : C ∞ (A) → C ∞ (X); van Douwen's result [5] shows that "conv-extender" in the above cannot be strengthened to "conv-extender". For normed-space-valued functions, I. Banakh, T. Banakh and K. Yamazaki [1, Theorem 4.1] prove that a normed space Y is reflexive if and only if for every closed subset A of a GO-space X, there exists a linear convextender u :…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example due to Heath and Lutzer shows that this additional hypothesis is necessary: in [4] they show that if X is the Michael line [7] and A is the closed subspace of X consisting of all rational numbers, then no simultaneous extender from C(A*) to C(X) can be found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%