2004
DOI: 10.1484/m.tema-eb.3.2137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duns Scot et la politique. Pouvoir du prince et conversion des Juifs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Hitherto, Scotism has been the object of research for historians of metaphysics and economics, rather than political theory; but the political charge of Scotus's own theology is now receiving analysis. 22 Scotist theology leaned towards voluntarism, tended to be sceptical about the utility of Aristotle's philosophy to Christians, and saw politics more as the reconciliation of clashing rights, including the rights of God, than as the opportunity for rational flourishing. They certainly subordinated natural ends more decisively to supernatural ends than the Thomists did.…”
Section: Erasmus Of Rotterdam Mentor Of Those Very Many Sixteenth-cen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Hitherto, Scotism has been the object of research for historians of metaphysics and economics, rather than political theory; but the political charge of Scotus's own theology is now receiving analysis. 22 Scotist theology leaned towards voluntarism, tended to be sceptical about the utility of Aristotle's philosophy to Christians, and saw politics more as the reconciliation of clashing rights, including the rights of God, than as the opportunity for rational flourishing. They certainly subordinated natural ends more decisively to supernatural ends than the Thomists did.…”
Section: Erasmus Of Rotterdam Mentor Of Those Very Many Sixteenth-cen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, Quaestiones in Libros IV Sententiarum, distinctio 4, q. 9, pp 275-280; Marmursztejn and Piron: 2004).…”
Section: Ninth Annual Reforc Conference On Early Modern Christianityunclassified
“…Baron Notre docteur ne pouvait pas penser autrement que ses contemporains sur ces questions de politique contingentes 98 ». Sans plus se soucier, dès lors, des positions divergentes 99 , L. Parisoli propose de relire le texte de Duns Scot sur les baptêmes forcés 100 comme l'« argumentation d'un partisan radical de l'engagement spirituel du pouvoir politique », « conforme à une certaine interprétation du droit de l'époque » 101 . L'accumulation de références au droit canonique -parmi lesquelles L. Parisoli souligne l'importance qu'a pu avoir pour Duns Scot le canon 60 de Tolède IV 102 , qui prescrivait l'enlèvement des enfants comme condition et garantie de leur éducation chrétienne -construit un arrière-plan censé manifester « l'évidence » du discours de Duns Scot, qui ne vise pas « la coexistence entre croyances religieuses différentes », ni « ne se pose [...] la question d'une société laïque à l'intérieur de laquelle peuvent cohabiter des confessions différentes » 103 .…”
Section: Une Histoire Longue De La Persécution Les Critiques De L'insunclassified