2022
DOI: 10.24988/ije.1005608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dünya’nın Teknolojik Başarısı: Ülkelerin, Kıtaların ve Dönemlerin Güncellenmesi ve Analizi

Abstract: This study examines the development of Technology Achievement Index for 72 nations from 1990 through 2019. The nations in the TAI are classified into four groups of countries and the determinants of TAI are comprised of creation of technology, diffusion of old technology, diffusion of new technology, and development of human skills for three periods of time. The main findings indicate that TAI ranking consists of leaders who are 9 countries, potential leaders are 43 countries, dynamic adopters are 5 countries,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another criterion (Criterion C) used in the selection of the countries where the research is aimed to be carried out within the sample is formed by ranking the countries according to the “Technology Achievement Index (TAI).” In this context, countries were classified according to the technological development index and the countries included in the study in this research sample were those in the “Leading Countries” group (Ağan, 2022, p. 259; Incekara et al, 2017, p. 169).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another criterion (Criterion C) used in the selection of the countries where the research is aimed to be carried out within the sample is formed by ranking the countries according to the “Technology Achievement Index (TAI).” In this context, countries were classified according to the technological development index and the countries included in the study in this research sample were those in the “Leading Countries” group (Ağan, 2022, p. 259; Incekara et al, 2017, p. 169).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%