Duplication and segregation of the actin (MreB) cytoskeleton during the prokaryotic cell cycle

Bacteria have a complex internal organization with specific localization of many proteins and DNA, which dynamically move during the cell cycle and in response to changing environmental stimuli. Much less is known, however, about the localization and movements of RNA molecules. By modifying our previous RNA labeling system, we monitor the expression and localization of a model RNA transcript in live Escherichia coli cells. Our results reveal that the target RNA is not evenly distributed within the cell and localizes laterally along the long cell axis, in a pattern suggesting the existence of ordered helical RNA structures reminiscent of known bacterial cytoskeletal cellular elements.espite their relatively small dimensions, bacterial cells show a remarkable, rich internal subcellular organization that has captured the interest of researchers over the past decade (1-4). Many cytoplasmic and membrane proteins, particularly those involved in cell division, DNA replication, and chromosome segregation, have specific subcellular localizations that can change quickly over time in response to cell cycle progression, motility, and environmental cues. This dynamic and organized behavior is also true for bacterial chromosomal DNA. The use of GFP fusions and in situ fluorescence hybridization (FISH) have shown that every chromosomal locus has a defined subcellular address and is replicated and segregated into the new cell as part of an active and directed process (4, 5). Bacterial plasmids, both low and high copy, also have specific cellular addresses and segregate in a fashion that is unique for a given plasmid (6-8).Little is known, however, about RNA dynamics in bacteria. With the advent of new methods to label RNA in live cells, the transcription kinetics, localization, and movement of RNA in the bacterium Escherichia coli has begun to be discerned only recently (9-13).To understand RNA dynamics in live cells better, it would be useful to develop RNA labeling methods that would allow direct visualization and real-time quantitation of RNAs with low background levels. We recently reported a system based on protein complementation that uses binding of a split and inactive protein complex to a short interacting sequence on a target RNA. The marker protein re-associates and becomes fluorescent only upon binding to RNA (13), which makes this approach more desirable than alternative techniques relying on expression of full-size fluorescent proteins. Briefly, the method consists of fusing the Nterminal fragment of EGFP to the N-terminal domain of an RNA-binding protein, the eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A), via a polypeptide linker. Similarly, the C-terminal fragment of EGFP is fused to the C-terminal domain of eIF4A. The target RNA is tagged at the 3Ј end with an aptamer sequence known to bind eIF4A with high affinity (14) (Fig. 1A). Expression of the labeling components in E. coli cells generates a fluorescent signal only in the presence of the target RNA, caused by the reassociation of the two EGFP fragments and forma...

Section: Estimation Of Number Of Egfp Molecules Per Cell After Rna Inmentioning

confidence: 84%

Spatiotemporal patterns and transcription kinetics of induced RNA in single bacterial cells

Valencia-Burton

Shah

Sutin

et al. 2009

“…The FtsZ-MreB colocalization persists for most of division until the late predivisional cell stage, when MreB readopts a patchy/ helical distribution (6,19). Such cell-cycle dynamics in MreB localization is not unusual, although the timing of ring localization appears to vary considerably among bacteria (21,22).…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

RodZ, a component of the bacterial core morphogenic apparatus

Alyahya

Alexander

Costa

et al. 2009

162

219

“…This view has been challenged, however, by more recent results. At least in the original images of E. coli (20,25), extended MreB helices were shown to be artifacts of the fluorescent protein tag (26,27). Later fluorescence studies reported that, instead of extended helices, MreB localizes in tight patches that, driven by PG synthesis, move circumferentially around the cell (28)(29)(30).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Coarse-grained simulations of bacterial cell wall growth reveal that local coordination alone can be sufficient to maintain rod shape

Nguyen

Gumbart

Beeby

et al. 2015

Bacteria are surrounded by a peptidoglycan (PG) cell wall that must be remodeled to allow cell growth. While many structural details and properties of PG and the individual enzymes involved are known, how the process is coordinated to maintain cell integrity and rod shape is not understood. We have developed a coarse-grained method to simulate how individual transglycosylases, transpeptidases, and endopeptidases could introduce new material into an existing unilayer PG network. We find that a simple model with no enzyme coordination fails to maintain cell wall integrity and rod shape. We then iteratively analyze failure modes and explore different mechanistic hypotheses about how each problem might be overcome by the macromolecules involved. In contrast to a current theory, which posits that long MreB filaments are needed to coordinate PG insertion sites, we find that local coordination of enzyme activities in individual complexes can be sufficient to maintain cell integrity and rod shape. We also present possible molecular explanations for the existence of monofunctional transpeptidases and glycosidases (glycoside hydrolases), trimeric peptide crosslinks, cell twisting during growth, and synthesis of new strands in pairs.coarse-grained modeling | cell wall synthesis | morphogenesis T he cytoplasmic membrane of Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria is surrounded by a peptidoglycan (PG) sacculus that protects the cell from internal turgor pressure, and its architecture determines the cell's shape (1, 2). The sacculus is composed of long glycan strands crosslinked by peptides into a mesh-like network. The glycan repeating unit is a disaccharide of an N-acetylglucosamine and an N-acetylmuramic acid attached to a stem pentapeptide L-Ala-D-iGlu-m-A 2 pm-D-Ala-D-Ala. Crosslinks are formed between peptides on adjacent strands-most at the fourth (D-Ala) residues of the donors and the third (m-A 2 pm) residues of the acceptors. While it is now understood that, in Gram-negative cells, the glycan strands run parallel to the cell surface, how the strands are arranged in this plane is still debated. While recent atomic force microscopy images of purified sacculi were interpreted to indicate that glycan strands had random orientations (3), electron cryotomography of sacculi (4) and other evidence from both Gramnegative (1, 5) and -positive (6, 7) sacculi have, instead, pointed to a universal "circumferential" model, in which the stiff glycan strands are circumferentially around the rod and the flexible peptide crosslinks parallel to the rod's long axis.Cell growth requires that the sacculus be elongated without losing its integrity or characteristic shape. This remodeling process requires the presence of not only transglycosylases and transpeptidases, also known as penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), to polymerize and crosslink new glycan strands into the existing network (2, 8) but also, endopeptidases to cleave covalent bonds to open space for the new material (9). How these small enzymes work together to maintain the order and...