2009
DOI: 10.1038/ng0809-862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duplications of noncoding elements 5′ of SOX9 are associated with brachydactyly-anonychia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, however, full mirror-image polydactyly was only present in the fetuses with larger genomic aberrations and therefore we cannot fully exclude that other genes in the deleted genomic region might cause, or at least influence this particular phenotype. As there is increasing evidence that copy number changes in non-coding genomic elements are implicated in bone disorders, 18,19 deletions of non-coding regulatory elements upstream or downstream of PITX1 might also account for the clinical variability observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, however, full mirror-image polydactyly was only present in the fetuses with larger genomic aberrations and therefore we cannot fully exclude that other genes in the deleted genomic region might cause, or at least influence this particular phenotype. As there is increasing evidence that copy number changes in non-coding genomic elements are implicated in bone disorders, 18,19 deletions of non-coding regulatory elements upstream or downstream of PITX1 might also account for the clinical variability observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown how mutations affecting the structure and integrity of RLs can led to spurious enhancer-promoter contacts (Figure 1 A similar situation is found in duplications of the KCNJ2-SOX9 genomic region, which are associated to the Cook syndrome [20]. A study using a mouse model reproducing this duplication shows that this rearrangement generates a new TAD that expose the When did this topology appear during evolution?…”
Section: Rl Restructuring In Disease and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[21][22][23] Thus, we also considered genes flanking the SRO as potentially responsible for the abnormal phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%