2004
DOI: 10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dura-splitting decompression of the craniocervical junction: reduced operative time, hospital stay, and cost with equivalent early outcome

Abstract: Dura-splitting CCJ decompression in pediatric patients with Chiari I malformation and without syringomyelia is safe, provides good early clinical results, and significantly reduces resource use. A randomized controlled trial of dura-splitting decompression in a uniform population of patients with Chiari I malformation is indicated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
63
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, several neurosurgical series have compared extradural PFD to duraplasty with mixed evidence to suggest any significant difference in symptomatic outcome. 17,19,22,23 To address study limitations of unbalanced demographics between treatment groups, presenting symptoms, and radiological findings, Lee and colleagues provided a balanced treatment comparison focusing on long-term clinical outcome and radiological syrinx improvement and proposed that extradural decompression for CM-I leads to comparable clinical and radiological improvement compared with traditional PFDD, but offers decreased postoperative morbidity. The authors recommended the more invasive PFDD as first-line treatment for more severe patients with rapidly progressive symptoms or severe neurological deficits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several neurosurgical series have compared extradural PFD to duraplasty with mixed evidence to suggest any significant difference in symptomatic outcome. 17,19,22,23 To address study limitations of unbalanced demographics between treatment groups, presenting symptoms, and radiological findings, Lee and colleagues provided a balanced treatment comparison focusing on long-term clinical outcome and radiological syrinx improvement and proposed that extradural decompression for CM-I leads to comparable clinical and radiological improvement compared with traditional PFDD, but offers decreased postoperative morbidity. The authors recommended the more invasive PFDD as first-line treatment for more severe patients with rapidly progressive symptoms or severe neurological deficits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In a comparison of duraplasty with intradural manipulation and dural splitting, the latter led to faster operating times, shorter hospital stays, and therefore lower total hospital costs while yielding comparable clinical results. 15,16 More specifically, dural splitting in patients with CM-I without syringomyelia was deemed to be safer and more cost effective, not including the cost savings from the reduction in overall complications. 16 preoperative assessment and prediction of Surgical Success-a multimodal approach…”
Section: Extradural Chiari Decompression Is a Viable And Reproduciblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In extradural decompression, some suggest using intraoperative ultrasonography to determine adequate CSF flow, 8 whereas with intradural techniques it is difficult to assess CSF flow intraoperatively. 13 While there is no consensus on which surgical technique is more effective, 5,9,15,20 an external decompression via splitting of the dura avoids the complications of a dura-penetrating craniectomy and laminectomy, 7,13 where there is the potential for CSF leak and pseudomeningocele formation as well as meningitis. 13,15 The need for potential reoperation given inadequate symptom resolution is balanced by the lower complication rate.…”
Section: Extradural Chiari Decompression Is a Viable And Reproduciblymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations