2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04405-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability and outcome of aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair versus double valve replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study results are different from those of Gillinov et al 11 that MVP had improved long-term survival compared with MVR in patients who underwent concomitant AVR. Hamamoto et al, 8 Kuwaki et al, 9 and Grossi et al 10 In-hospital and median survival rates were better in male compared with female patients in this investigation. Inhospital mortality rate for males was 13% compared with 18% for females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study results are different from those of Gillinov et al 11 that MVP had improved long-term survival compared with MVR in patients who underwent concomitant AVR. Hamamoto et al, 8 Kuwaki et al, 9 and Grossi et al 10 In-hospital and median survival rates were better in male compared with female patients in this investigation. Inhospital mortality rate for males was 13% compared with 18% for females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…In 1992, Galloway et al 7 from New York City documented a 78% 5-year survival in 513 patients (mean follow-up, 3.1 years) who underwent DVS. In 2003, Hamamoto et al 8 from Japan published a 15-year survival of 81% for 379 patients who had aortic (AVR) and mitral (MVR) valve replacement and of 79% for 80 patients who had AVR and MV repair (MVP). In 2007, Kuwaki et al, 9 also from Japan, reported a 12-year freedom from cardiac-related death of 81% for 47 patients who had AVR and MVR and of 79% for 80 patients who had AVR and MVP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experience in this 21-year study shows that both DVR and AVR+MVrep lead to excellent long-term survival and low morbidity as comparable to other studies [4-7]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Much of the data recently published comparing DVR to AVR+MVrep considers a heterogeneous population of patients undergoing replacement with various mechanical and bioprosthetic valves [4-6]. A major strength of this study, is that it is confined to a single prosthetic valve and hence removes the confounding influences of the different mechanical valves and the earlier structural deterioration associated with bioprosthetic valves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of cases, the degree of mitral regurgitation remains mild 1+ or 2+ and will resolve spontaneously after relieving the outflow obstruction [42]. Some patients will, however, present with moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (3+, 4+) that may require intervention on the mitral valve.…”
Section: Mitral Regurgitation In the Setting Of Calcified Aortic Valvmentioning
confidence: 99%