1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70218-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability of new squamous epithelium after endoscopic reversal of Barrett’s esophagus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies followed the same patient population. 2 Studies followed the same patient population. 3 Studies followed the same patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies followed the same patient population. 2 Studies followed the same patient population. 3 Studies followed the same patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1999, Sharma et al [2] reported on 11 patients with BE who were followed by endoscopic surveillance after treatment with multipolar electrocoagulation and maintenance with high-dose PPI therapy (omeprazole; mean dose 49 mg/day). All patients had an initial complete response to treatment with no evidence of Barrett's epithelium macroscopically or at biopsy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been reported in 0-44 % of cases, and the long-term follow-up of successfully treated patients showed recurrence of SIM ranging from 0-68 % [149]. This is not specific for the type of ablative therapy, and a number of investigators using various modes of ablative therapy have reported this finding [150][151][152][153][154][155][156]. Residual SIM carries with it the potential to progress to dysplasia/EAC, but the magnitude of this risk is not well characterized [155,156].…”
Section: Ablation Therapy For Dysplasia and Eacmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Sampliner et al [24] observed only one case of stenosis out of 72 patients treated the same way. Sharma et al [25] and Sampliner et al [26] had no complications. However success rates were also lower, 81%, 78% and 73%, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%