Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a multifaceted, complex, and progressive arrhythmia which resulted in electrical, contractile, and structural atrial remodeling. 1 There is an interplay between trigger(s) and substrate for disease initiation and maintenance. 2 After the definition of pulmonary veins (PVs) as an important trigger of atrial ectopic beats and AF paroxysms, 3 pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone of all AF ablation procedures. 2 Although PVI is an anatomic and empirical approach rather than a pathophysiological treatment in each patient, it is an objective, standard, and reproducible endpoint independent of the mechanism(s) of AF. The last few decades witnessed a significant advancement and evolution in AF management, particularly in the field of catheter ablation. 2 Radiofrequency (RF) and cryogenic (cryoballoon [CB]) energy are two main sources of catheter ablation for AF with similar efficacy and safety profile in paroxysmal AF. 4 However, it is hard to isolate all PVs permanently and PV reconduction (reconnection or gap) in one or more PVs was reported in more than 80% of patients in previous studies and meta-analyses. [5][6][7][8] Novel ablation techniques and technologies like CLOSE-guided PVI using contact-force (CF)sensing RF ablation catheter and three-dimensional-mapping