2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration effects in contingency management treatment of methamphetamine disorders

Abstract: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether different durations of contingency management (CM) in conjunction with psychosocial treatment produced different rates of abstinence among methamphetamine dependent individuals. Participants were randomized to one of four 16-week treatment conditions: standard psychosocial treatment or psychosocial treatment plus one of three durations of CM (one-month, two-month, or four-month). A total of 118 participants were randomized to the four treatment conditions.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As argued elsewhere, our rat model of relapse/incubation after choice-based voluntary abstinence is analogous to the human condition of relapse to drug use after termination of contingency management (Caprioli et al, 2015a). Regarding the 'translational' value of our new model, the data on lack of sex differences in both the efficacy of our choice-based procedure in inhibiting drug selfadministration and relapse after cessation of 'contingency management' agree with the lack of gender differences in the efficacy of contingency management or the high relapse rates after treatment cessation in humans (Epstein et al, 2009;Lussier et al, 2006;Roll et al, 2013).…”
Section: Clinical Implications and Future Research Directionssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As argued elsewhere, our rat model of relapse/incubation after choice-based voluntary abstinence is analogous to the human condition of relapse to drug use after termination of contingency management (Caprioli et al, 2015a). Regarding the 'translational' value of our new model, the data on lack of sex differences in both the efficacy of our choice-based procedure in inhibiting drug selfadministration and relapse after cessation of 'contingency management' agree with the lack of gender differences in the efficacy of contingency management or the high relapse rates after treatment cessation in humans (Epstein et al, 2009;Lussier et al, 2006;Roll et al, 2013).…”
Section: Clinical Implications and Future Research Directionssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Participants received cognitive behavioral therapy, based largely on the Matrix Model (Rawson et al 1990). The details of this approach are presented in Roll et al (2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum cash value of vouchers delivered to participants who remained continuously abstinent from methamphetamine was $1,155.00 in all three conditions. This is a typical amount of available reinforcement (Higgins et al 1994; Roll et al 2013; Silverman et al 1996) for studies of this type. In all three contingency management conditions, the amounts of money were adjusted to equate reinforcer magnitudes across conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this juncture, it would be helpful to demonstrate the efficacy of “higher value” CM prior to testing lower-cost alternatives, as there is evidence for greater effectiveness of these larger reward CM procedures, particularly with patients evidencing more severe substance use (Petry & Roll, 2011; Petry et al, 2004). In addition, extending the duration of CM procedures has shown promise for improving substance use outcomes among non-SMI populations (Roll, Chudzynski, Cameron, Howell, & McPherson, 2013) and could be of value in improving outcomes among SMI individuals.…”
Section: Contingency Management Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%