1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1747.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration of filgrastim mobilization and apheresis yield of CD34+ progenitor cells and lymphoid subsets in normal donors for allogeneic transplantation

Abstract: Seventy-seven normal donors underwent leukapheresis for peripheral blood progenitor cell collection beginning on day 4 (n = 45) or day 5 (n = 32) of filgrastim mobilization (12 micrograms/kg/d). The two groups were comparable for age, weight, blood volumes processed during leukapheresis and target CD34+ cell dose to be collected. The day 5 schedule allowed a more consistent achievement of the target cell dose with one apheresis (P = 0.005) and resulted in the initial collection of a significantly larger number… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second course of filgrastim treatment resulted in similar mobilization of CD34 þ progenitor cells and apheresis yield as the initial collection from the same donors. The fact that in some cases leukapheresis was performed after different durations of filgrastim administration may have confounded the picture to some degree, as the duration of filgrastim mobilization can have a significant impact on the apheresis yield (Anderlini et al, 1996a). In at least some of the cases, a sizeable difference in the apheresis yield between the two collections was probably accounted for by a different duration of filgrastim mobilization (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second course of filgrastim treatment resulted in similar mobilization of CD34 þ progenitor cells and apheresis yield as the initial collection from the same donors. The fact that in some cases leukapheresis was performed after different durations of filgrastim administration may have confounded the picture to some degree, as the duration of filgrastim mobilization can have a significant impact on the apheresis yield (Anderlini et al, 1996a). In at least some of the cases, a sizeable difference in the apheresis yield between the two collections was probably accounted for by a different duration of filgrastim mobilization (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other cases, leukapheresis was started on different days (n ¼ 3) or this information was not available (n ¼ 5). The day 4 and day 5 schedules were evaluated as part of a study (Anderlini et al, 1996a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, a decrease of circulating CFU-GM and CD34þ cells was noted, even though G-CSF administration had been continued [10,11]. The highest peak occurs on day 5, but to avoid prolonged exposure to G-CSF some investigators start collection on day 4, however, comparative analysis showed a higher cell yield for the day 5 collection: in a study from the MD Anderson Hospital leukapheresis on day 5 resulted in a higher CD34þ cell harvest compared to apheresis on day 4 after G-CSF stimulation ð7:8 vs 4:9 £ 10 6 CD34 þ cells=kg; p ¼ 0:01Þ [12]. Therefore, on day 5 the optimal time for stem cell collection in healthy donors is after starting G-CSF administration.…”
Section: Timing Of Leukapheresis After G-csf Administrationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[5][6][7] To avoid prolonged exposure to G-CSF other investigators started collection on day 4, but comparative analysis showed a higher cell yield for the day 5 collection. 26,27 A higher CD34 + cell yield can also be achieved by large volume apheresis, processing three to four times the total donor body weight per apheresis. 28 In summary, our study confirmed a dose-dependency of G-CSF when applied for mobilisation of peripheral blood progenitor cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%