1997
DOI: 10.1128/iai.65.10.4043-4047.1997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration of immunity to reinfection with tick-transmitted Borrelia burgdorferi in naturally infected mice

Abstract: The ability of naturally infected and cured mice to resist reinfection with tick-transmitted Borrelia burgdorferi was tested over a 1-year period. All of the mice were resistant to reinfection when they were challenged at 1.5 months after cure. The majority of animals were resistant to reinfection for up to 10.5 months after cure, but this resistance was lost at 1 year after cure. Both protected and unprotected animals showed a diverse array of antibodies on Western immunoblots. Protection was not associated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was previously shown that active infection followed by antibiotic treatment and then challenge with infected-tissue transplants prevents homologous transplantborne infection (4). Likewise, a recently published study demonstrated that active infection followed by antibiotic treatment protects mice against tick-borne challenge infection with the same B. burgdorferi strain for over 1 year (39). This result is in keeping with my findings of durable (1-year) protective immunity against homologous challenge with cultured spirochetes, regardless of challenge dose (up to 10 6 spirochetes), and protective immunity against homologous transplant-borne challenge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It was previously shown that active infection followed by antibiotic treatment and then challenge with infected-tissue transplants prevents homologous transplantborne infection (4). Likewise, a recently published study demonstrated that active infection followed by antibiotic treatment protects mice against tick-borne challenge infection with the same B. burgdorferi strain for over 1 year (39). This result is in keeping with my findings of durable (1-year) protective immunity against homologous challenge with cultured spirochetes, regardless of challenge dose (up to 10 6 spirochetes), and protective immunity against homologous transplant-borne challenge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The absolute requirement for the vls locus in persistence associated with Lyme disease led us to question whether mice originally infected with spirochetes lacking VlsE could be reinfected with a fully infectious clone that has an intact vls recombination system. Previous studies have shown that cured mice are immune to reinfection when challenged by intradermal inoculation or with an autograft from infected mice (Barthold, 1993;Piesman et al, 1997). However, these studies involved challenging actively immunized mice previously infected with a fully infectious clone of B. burgdorferi with autologous isolates, compared with the present study, where mice naturally cleared of partially infectious spirochetes are challenged with fully infectious clones.…”
Section: Vlse Does Not Appear To Confer Reinfection Abilitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Acquired immunity in the vertebrate host plays an important role in the epidemiology of Lyme disease (Johnson et al ., 1986a,b; Kurtenbach et al ., ; Piesman et al ., ; Liang et al ., ). One Borrelia antigen that is particularly important for the pathogen's interaction with the vertebrate immune system is outer surface protein C (OspC) (Radolf and Caimano, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%