2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-3791(01)00011-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration of interglacials: a controversial question

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important consideration if the Mn colour cycles are to be used for chronostratigraphic correlations between cores from different regions with different sedimentation rates. If the brown Mn‐enriched cycles in the Arctic Ocean indeed represent interglacials, a duration on the order of 10 Ky is expected for each interglacial (Forsström 2001; Lisiecki & Raymo 2005). Bioturbation and diffusion therefore does not pose any substantial problem for the preservation of the Mn peaks in the studied core, although they may have been reduced in amplitude (Anderson 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important consideration if the Mn colour cycles are to be used for chronostratigraphic correlations between cores from different regions with different sedimentation rates. If the brown Mn‐enriched cycles in the Arctic Ocean indeed represent interglacials, a duration on the order of 10 Ky is expected for each interglacial (Forsström 2001; Lisiecki & Raymo 2005). Bioturbation and diffusion therefore does not pose any substantial problem for the preservation of the Mn peaks in the studied core, although they may have been reduced in amplitude (Anderson 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En particular, el MIS5 presenta mayor variabilidad de la que se había sospechado. Tras una notable controversia científica (Shackleton, 1969;Woillard y Mook, 1982;Guiot et al, 1989;Kukla et al, 1997;Chapman y Shackleton, 1999;Forsström, 2001;Tzedakis, 2003;Hodge et al, 2008), parece que ya existe cierto consenso sobre la duración del último interglacial, la cual sería aproximadamente de 16 000 ó 17 000 años, situándose entre 128 000 y 112 000 años BP. Esto implica una corres-pondencia en la mayoría de las secuencias con el segmento isotópico MIS5e-5d (Brauer et al, 2007), si bien hay alguna pequeña desviación local (Sier et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Kukla et al, 1997;Forsstrom, 2001) because the correlation with the well documented marine records are still uncertain. In the scope of dating Late Quaternary sediment studies, magnetostratigraphy retains its position as a powerful stratigraphic tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%