Duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in adolescents and adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives Adults with fixed orthodontic appliances are increasing nowadays. Compared with adolescents, adults present biological differences that might influence treatment duration. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare duration of treatment with fixed appliances between adults and adolescents. Materials and methods Eight databases were searched up to September 2019 for randomized and non-randomized clinical studies comparing treatment duration with fixed appliances in adolescents and adult patients. After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment with the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool, random effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed, followed by assessment of the quality of evidence with GRADE. Results A total of 11 unique studies (one prospective and 10 retrospective non-randomized) with 2969 adolescents and 1380 adult patients were finally included. Meta-analysis of 7 studies found no significant difference in the duration of comprehensive treatment with fixed appliances (MD = − 0.8 month; 95% CI = − 4.2 to 2.6 months; P = 0.65; I2 = 92%) between adults and adolescents. Similarly, both distalization of upper first molars with skeletal anchorage for class II correction and the retraction of canines into the premolar extraction spaces lasted similarly long among adults and adolescents. On the other hand, alignment of palatally displaced canines lasted considerably longer in adults compared to adolescents (1 study; MD = 3.8 months; 95% CI = 1.4 to 6.2 months; P = 0.002). The quality of evidence for the meta-analysis was low due to the inclusion of non-randomized studies with considerable risk of bias. Conclusions While existing evidence does not indicate a difference in the overall duration of treatment with fixed appliances between adults and adolescents, the alignment of palatally displaced canines lasted significantly longer in adults. However, our confidence in these estimates is low due to the risk of bias in the included studies. Trial registration PROSPERO: (CRD42019148169)

The impact of the loss of first permanent molars on the duration of treatment in patients treated with orthodontic space closure and without skeletal anchorage

“…A systematic review [ 10 ] showed that the duration of orthodontic treatment in adults does not differ from adolescents. However, this review did not include studies with individuals with loss of the first permanent molar.…”

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on total treatment time of fixed appliances

“…The patients’ ages in the sample ranged from 10 to 59 years. A systematic review with a meta-analysis [ 28 ] showed that there is no difference in treatment time between adults and adolescents. This corroborates the findings of this study, which showed no effect of age on the variability of orthodontic treatment time.…”

The Attitudes of Children Undergoing Orthodontic Treatment toward Face Mask Wearing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross Sectional Study

“…A particular group of patients who were affected by the discontinuation of the activity of dental offices, were patients undergoing an orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic treatment is frequently recommended for functional restoration and facial aesthetics improvement [ 17 ], and extends over longer periods of time, sometimes up to 24 months or even longer depending on the age and clinical condition of the patients [ 18 ]. It requires regular check-ups every 6 to 8 weeks [ 19 ].…”