1956
DOI: 10.1002/aja.1000990307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration of spermatogenesis in the mouse and timing of stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
426
4
6

Year Published

1964
1964
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 892 publications
(447 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
11
426
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The time (day) between defined spermatogenic stages was adopted from the literature [34,37] and was used to estimate the irradiated precursors of collected cell types. All cell types collected from mice treated at 6-d/o were from irradiated primitive type A spermatogonia.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Spermatogenic Cells To Mutagenesis By Irmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time (day) between defined spermatogenic stages was adopted from the literature [34,37] and was used to estimate the irradiated precursors of collected cell types. All cell types collected from mice treated at 6-d/o were from irradiated primitive type A spermatogonia.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Spermatogenic Cells To Mutagenesis By Irmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testis.-The cell-cycle kinetics of spermatogenesis in the mouse testis have been studied extensively (Oakberg, 1956;Meistrich et al, 1978). While the response of spermatogonial stem cells will determine long-term sterility, this population in the testis of the mouse shows considerable resistance to most chemotherapeutic agents.…”
Section: Tumour Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…alkylating agents by misonidazole (1-[2-nitromidazole-1 -yl] -3 -methoxypropan -2-ol) (MISO) has been reported for several mouse tumour systems by many authors (Rose et al, 1980;Tannock, 1980;Clement et al, 1980;Martin et al, 1981;Law et al, 1981;Siemann, 1981;Stephens et al, 1981;Twentyman et al, 1981;AMulcahy et al, 1981). Most of these studies have shown that, at least under some circumstances, MISO is more effective in increasing the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents to tumours than to normal tissues, thereby giving a positive therapeutic gain, though there is no clear consensus as to the mechanisms involved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mouse we know, from the interval between treatment and a given mating, the stage of maturation that the sperm used in that mating had reached at the time of treatment. This is because the time-table of spermatogenesis has been established by Oakberg (1956) and the time taken for the passage of sperm through epididymis and vas deferens has been estimated by Sirlin and Edwards (1957). Thus, one can assess the mutagenic sensitivity of the various stages of maturation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%