2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-0691-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration prediction models for construction projects: In terms of cost or physical characteristics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, based on the case studies applied to local office buildings, the accuracy and validity of the developed model was verified by comparison analysis between the actual construction duration and the predicted construction duration calculated from an approximate construction duration prediction model. Generally, the construction duration for office buildings are determined in two ways: the owner defines the project duration directly (Jin et al 2016;Bayram 2017;Peško et al 2017) or the contractor suggests construction duration to the owner. On the other hand, the construction duration computation model utilized by contractors during the project planning stage (Table 1) is not a specialized standard for general office buildings Koo et al 2010;Jin et al 2016;Kim et al 2016;Thomas, N., Thomas, A. V. 2016).…”
Section: Scope and Methods Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, based on the case studies applied to local office buildings, the accuracy and validity of the developed model was verified by comparison analysis between the actual construction duration and the predicted construction duration calculated from an approximate construction duration prediction model. Generally, the construction duration for office buildings are determined in two ways: the owner defines the project duration directly (Jin et al 2016;Bayram 2017;Peško et al 2017) or the contractor suggests construction duration to the owner. On the other hand, the construction duration computation model utilized by contractors during the project planning stage (Table 1) is not a specialized standard for general office buildings Koo et al 2010;Jin et al 2016;Kim et al 2016;Thomas, N., Thomas, A. V. 2016).…”
Section: Scope and Methods Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, although coefficient K, obtained from Bayram (2017), is similar to coefficient K for the educational buildings in this study, coefficient B, obtained from Bayram (2017)'s study is similar to coefficient B of hospital projects in this study. It is worthwhile to mention that in Bayram's (2017) data set is a composition of 530 public projects which mainly consist of educational buildings (432) and hospital projects (56), therefore direct comparison with this study will not yield accurate results, since all the projects are analyzed together [3].…”
Section: Basic Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This relationship proposed by the researcher is known as Bromilow's time -cost (BTC) model in the literature. This result is undoubtedly a very important guide both for the investors and the contractors in estimating the duration of the project as far as possible [3]. Bromilow has also stated that the time and cost variables of the BTC model can be affected and varied at various levels by a number of factors such as the type of project, the climate conditions of the location where the project is realized, the changes in the exchange rate, and the terms of the contract [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed integrated approach accounts for an alternative for conceptual estimation of costs. Furthermore, Bayram (2017) aimed at investigating and validating the 'Bromilow's time-cost (BTC) model' and the 'Love et al's time-floor (LTF) model' for Turkish public building projects, with emphasis on project duration. At the same time, the current research also provides 'best-fit models' as a benchmark for the BTC and the LTF models in order to fill the gap in construction duration predictions.…”
Section: Project Performance Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%