2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dust characterization in FTU tokamak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to experimentally verify that the magnetic moment force is responsible for the observed phenomena, exposures of calibrated adhered ferromagnetic and non-magnetic dust to pure magnetic field discharges have been carried out. Dust collection activities in FTU have revealed that the dust size distribution ranges from the sub-micron range to the millimeter range [39]. Our exposures will focus on dust sizes of several microns for a number of reasons (i) larger grains are much easier to remobilize (see section 3.1), which could lead to problems during sample transportation and mounting, (ii) the sticking velocity of larger grains is very small [24], which could lead to problems during sample preparation, (iii) smaller grains are hardly remobilizable and cannot interfere with tokamak start-up unless their density is unrealistically high.…”
Section: Exposure Of Pre-adhered Non-magnetic and Ferromagn Etic Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to experimentally verify that the magnetic moment force is responsible for the observed phenomena, exposures of calibrated adhered ferromagnetic and non-magnetic dust to pure magnetic field discharges have been carried out. Dust collection activities in FTU have revealed that the dust size distribution ranges from the sub-micron range to the millimeter range [39]. Our exposures will focus on dust sizes of several microns for a number of reasons (i) larger grains are much easier to remobilize (see section 3.1), which could lead to problems during sample transportation and mounting, (ii) the sticking velocity of larger grains is very small [24], which could lead to problems during sample preparation, (iii) smaller grains are hardly remobilizable and cannot interfere with tokamak start-up unless their density is unrealistically high.…”
Section: Exposure Of Pre-adhered Non-magnetic and Ferromagn Etic Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the shutdown of FTU at the beginning of 2013, as already reported in a previous paper [16], the vacuum vessel was thoroughly cleaned and deposited dust was collected. Since the FTU wall is made of stainless steel (SS) AISI 304LN grade and the tiles for poloidal and toroidal limiters are made of TZM 6 , the collected dust was predictably mainly composed of SS elements and Mo based grains.…”
Section: Vessel and Pfc Characteristics Of Ftu And Criteria And Metho...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dust collection methods, dust size and classification are presented in more details in ref. [16]. The dust collected from the bottom of the machine by gross vacuuming was later divided in two different batches, comprising grains either smaller or larger than 210 μm (value chosen on the basis of meshes availability around the value of 200 μm); this value was chosen to distinguish the two batches because dust larger than few 100's μm are unlikely to be mobilized by plasma [12,[16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Vessel and Pfc Characteristics Of Ftu And Criteria And Metho...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations