1992
DOI: 10.1016/1042-9573(92)90003-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dutch auction versus fixed-price self-tender offers for common stock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This adjusted R2 is substantially higher than those reported by Kamma, Kanatas and Raymar [6] for expiration day returns for a combined sample of fixed-price and Dutch auction offers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…This adjusted R2 is substantially higher than those reported by Kamma, Kanatas and Raymar [6] for expiration day returns for a combined sample of fixed-price and Dutch auction offers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…And in 70 percent of the fixed price RTOs and 90 percent of the Dutch auction RTOs where insiders tender or sell shares they do not reveal their intentions to tender (or sell). 171 In other words, insiders avoid signaling to public shareholders that the actual value is below the offer price. Such signaling would cause public shareholders to tender more shares, reducing insiders' participation in the high price RTO.…”
Section: Evidence Of Insider Trading Rtosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comment and Jarrell (1991) find a three‐day return of 7.5%. Kamma, Kanatas, and Raymar (1990) find a 6.6% return, with 86% positive on the announcement day.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Kamma, Kanatas, and Raymar (1990) find a −1.3% average abnormal residual at the expiration, with 30% of the expiration abnormal returns positive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%