Dutch Restrained Eating Questionnaire

Strien, Tatjana van; Frijters, J.E.R.; Bergers, Gerard P. A.; Defares, P.B.

doi:10.1037/t04580-000

Cited by 31 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Eating behavior was assessed using the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire 23,24. Over time, we found no significant changes in restrained eating.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 69%

Weight loss and eating behavior following vertical banded gastroplasty

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundBariatric surgery is the treatment of choice for patients with morbid obesity. In addition to surgery, postoperative dietary behavior is an important mediator of weight loss and, therefore, critical in influencing outcome. Surgical treatment of obesity is not an alternative to dieting but a method to enforce dieting.MethodsWe evaluated early weight loss and postoperative eating behavior over time. Preoperatively as well as 6 months, 1 and 2 years after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), 91 patients were psychologically assessed using a semi-structured interview and a psychological questionnaire focusing on eating behavior.ResultsOver time, we found significant changes in weight, mostly in the 1st postoperative year (EWL= 52.0%); at 2 years, EWL was 61.5%. Patients reported substantial changes in feelings of hunger, appetite, satiety, and eating behavior; however, most improvements waned over time. In addition, there was a wide variability in changes within our patient group, and changes in weight loss appeared to be related to changes in restrained eating.ConclusionVBG not only leads to considerable weight loss, but also to significant improvements in eating behavior, at least within 2 years. However, most improvements wane over time and not all patients profit in the same way.

show abstract

“…Eating behavior was assessed using the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire 23,24. Over time, we found no significant changes in restrained eating.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 69%

Weight loss and eating behavior following vertical banded gastroplasty

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This 91 idea is further supported by studies showing strong associations between self-reported emotional 92 eating, external eating, and dietary restraint (Jansen, et al, 2011;Turner, Luszczynska, Warner, & 93 Schwarzer, 2010; Van Strien, et al, 1986). In addition, there is some evidence that positive emotions can 94 also induce overeating (i.e., higher intake in an experimental compared to a control procedure) in 95 people who score high on an emotional eating questionnaire (Bongers, Jansen, Havermans, Roefs, & 96…”

mentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Such disinhibiting factors leading to overeating 56 could be internal cues (e.g., emotions), or external cues (e.g., the sight or smell of food), and two types 57 of eaters have been presented accordingly: emotional eaters (assumed to be specifically responsive to 58 negative emotions) and external eaters (assumed to be specifically responsive to external food cues) 59 (Van Strien, Frijters, Bergers, & Defares, 1986). These eater types are distinguished from restrained 60 eaters, who are supposed to succeed in restraining their food intake (Van Strien, et al, 1986). Currently, 61 the distinction between emotional, external and restrained eaters is generally accepted, and the past 20 62 years have seen a wealth of studies devoted to these specific subtypes.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Emotional’ does not even start to cover it: Generalization of overeating in emotional eaters

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on recent studies indicating that emotional eating is not the clearly defined problem it is often 33 thought to be, the present study investigated whether emotional eaters overeat merely in response to 34 negative emotional cues, or to other cues as well. It was hypothesized that emotional eaters would 35 overeat after a variety of food cues, not limited to negative emotions. Participants took part in four 36 conditions (negative mood manipulation, positive mood manipulation, food exposure and a control 37 condition) divided over two sessions. Each condition was followed by a bogus taste test, after which 38 food intake was measured. Results showed strong correlations between food intake after all four 39 conditions, indicating that increased intake after one type of cue is related to increased intake after 40 other cues. Participants were identified as emotional or non-emotional eaters based on food intake in 41 the negative mood condition, and based on self-reported emotional eating scores. Both measures of 42 emotional eating were significantly related to food intake after all cues. Based on the current findings, 43we conclude that individuals who show increased food intake when in a negative emotional state also 44 overeat when experiencing other food-signalling cues. This indicates that 'emotional eating' may not 45 fully capture the eating behaviour of individuals currently identified as 'emotional eaters'. 46 47 48

show abstract

“…Participants were contacted from 315 students who had completed the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ; Van Strien, Frijters, Bergers, & Defares, 1986) and scored within the top or bottom twenty per cent on the external eating subscale (scores <2.7 and >3.7 for low and high external eating scores respectively).…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Attentional biases for food stimuli in external eaters: Possible mechanism for stress-induced eating?

Newman¹,

O’Connor²,

Conner³

2008

Appetite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

External eaters reportedly increase snack intake when stressed, which could be due to a shift in attention towards food stimuli. Attentional biases for food stimuli were tested in high and low external eaters in stress and control conditions, using a computerised Stroop. A significant interaction was observed between external eating group and condition for snack word bias. This suggested that low external eaters have a greater bias for snack words when unstressed and that stressed, high external have a greater bias for snack words than stressed, low external eaters, which could contribute to stress-induced snack intake in high external eaters.

show abstract

Dutch Restrained Eating Questionnaire

Cited by 31 publications

References 0 publications

Weight loss and eating behavior following vertical banded gastroplasty

Weight loss and eating behavior following vertical banded gastroplasty

‘Emotional’ does not even start to cover it: Generalization of overeating in emotional eaters

Attentional biases for food stimuli in external eaters: Possible mechanism for stress-induced eating?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About