Duties of Disclosure and French Contract Law: Contribution To an Economic Analysis

Fabre-Magnan, Muriel

doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265788.003.0004

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…58 French law stipulates that a party is liable for negotiating a preliminary contract in bad faith, conceivably giving rise to a remedy beyond damages for breach of contract. 59 Thus, in many European jurisdictions, the foundation of a general obligation of a legal person to act in good faith is an overarching loyalty to and respect for legal undertakings, of which obligations arising from a promise, including a promise to negotiate in good faith, are a part. 60 In addition, civil law systems subject parties to the legal obligation to cooperate in their mutual dealings, including in negotiations.…”

Section: B Historical and Doctrinal Foundations Of A Duty Of Good Famentioning

confidence: 99%

The Binding Force of Agreements to Negotiate in Good Faith

Trakman

Sharma

2014

C.L.J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article evaluates the established judicial proposition that an agreement to negotiate in good faith is antithetical to the principles of the common law. English courts are reluctant to enforce such agreements on the ground that they constitute unenforceable “agreements to agree”. Recently, courts have started to recognise an exception in cases where parties agree to negotiate over a term mandated by an existing agreement, such as to review a price clause or resolve a dispute by undertaking negotiations in good faith. The primary arguments against enforcing an independent agreement to negotiate in good faith are threefold. First, parties engaged in good faith negotiations are assumed to lack a serious legal intention to contract. Second, such an agreement is substantively uncertain in nature and does not promise to produce a contract. Third, the failure of parties to conclude their negotiations does not lead to an easily identifiable loss. In light of these considerations, this article considers the viability of enforcing an agreement to negotiate in good faith in the absence of a pre-existing contract. It argues that the legal obstacles to recognising agreements to negotiate have been overstated. Given the commercial value of enforcing such agreements, it proposes that agreements to negotiate in good faith should be recognised and given legal content by common law courts.

show abstract

Section: B Historical and Doctrinal Foundations Of A Duty Of Good Famentioning

confidence: 99%