2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

56
388
10
12

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 376 publications
(466 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
56
388
10
12
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several reasons to focus on these variables. First, relationship satisfaction is one of the most important variables in dyadic processes research (Falconier et al 2015). Second, positive emotions and relationship satisfaction are indicators of subjective well-being (e.g., Diener et al 1999).…”
Section: The Effects Of Daily Psychological Detachment and Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons to focus on these variables. First, relationship satisfaction is one of the most important variables in dyadic processes research (Falconier et al 2015). Second, positive emotions and relationship satisfaction are indicators of subjective well-being (e.g., Diener et al 1999).…”
Section: The Effects Of Daily Psychological Detachment and Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled parents can access a dyadic coping strategy, where they combine individual skills and capacities to deal with daily stressors or to support their partner in managing stressors (Bodenmann, 1995). In positive dyadic coping, couples can express and share stressful situations, receive both practical and emotional support from their partner, request for help in managing the stressors, and use a collaborative approach to cope with the stressors (Falconier, Jackson, Hilpert, & Bodenmann, 2015). However, single mothers simply do not have access to spousal support.…”
Section: Acceptance Coping Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they have documented that positive coping styles can improve relationship functioning (Badr, Carmack, Kashy, Cristofanilli, & Revenson, 2010;Falconier, Jackson, Hilpert, & Bodenmann, 2015;Regan et al, 2014;Rottmann et al, 2015;Traa, de Vries, Bodenmann, & den Oudsten, 2015). In particular, they have documented that positive coping styles can improve relationship functioning (Badr, Carmack, Kashy, Cristofanilli, & Revenson, 2010;Falconier, Jackson, Hilpert, & Bodenmann, 2015;Regan et al, 2014;Rottmann et al, 2015;Traa, de Vries, Bodenmann, & den Oudsten, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they have documented that positive coping styles can improve relationship functioning (Badr, Carmack, Kashy, Cristofanilli, & Revenson, 2010;Falconier, Jackson, Hilpert, & Bodenmann, 2015;Regan et al, 2014;Rottmann et al, 2015;Traa, de Vries, Bodenmann, & den Oudsten, 2015). common DC, which involves both partners working together and jointly managing stress, reported higher relationship satisfaction Falconier et al, 2015). Couples using positive DC, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%