2023
DOI: 10.3390/nu15102343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyadic Predictors of Willing to Engage in Physical Activity and Emotional Eating in Children and Adolescents with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disability

Abstract: Intellectual disability is associated with increased risk for childhood obesity, and the factors most often associated with this risk are incorrect eating behavior and insufficient amount and intensity of physical activity. As is well known, there area whole range of factors determining lifestyle, but many currently available reports in this field refer to the functioning of children without a diagnosis of intellectual disability, and, as we know, due to numerous individual and environmental barriers, children… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Contour Drawing Rating Scale (CRDS), the Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ), and the Emotional Overeating Questionnaire (EOQ) were used in the study to assess the relationship between engaging in physical activity and emotional eating in children and adolescents with mild and moderate intellectual disability [108]. The CRDS was found to be highly correlated (0.64) with measured BMI and exhibited a high test-retest reliability for current size, ideal size, and current-ideal discrepancy (0.65~0.87) [109].…”
Section: Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Contour Drawing Rating Scale (CRDS), the Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ), and the Emotional Overeating Questionnaire (EOQ) were used in the study to assess the relationship between engaging in physical activity and emotional eating in children and adolescents with mild and moderate intellectual disability [108]. The CRDS was found to be highly correlated (0.64) with measured BMI and exhibited a high test-retest reliability for current size, ideal size, and current-ideal discrepancy (0.65~0.87) [109].…”
Section: Scalementioning
confidence: 99%