2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2034305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyads, Triads, and the Theory of Exchange: Between Liberty and Coercion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is different to simple dyadic (two‐party) relations and supply chain relations (strings of dyadic relations). This is a triadic relation, established ‘to change the pattern created through dyadic exchanges’ (Podemska‐Mikluch & Wagner, 2013, p. 182). The economics literature differentiates between two forms of triadic relations: ‘triadic‐by‐assertion’, where a third party inserts themselves into a dyadic relation for its own benefit; and ‘triadic‐by‐invitation’, where a party is invited into a dyadic relationship by one or more parties to help facilitate the relationship (Podemska‐Mikluch & Wagner, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is different to simple dyadic (two‐party) relations and supply chain relations (strings of dyadic relations). This is a triadic relation, established ‘to change the pattern created through dyadic exchanges’ (Podemska‐Mikluch & Wagner, 2013, p. 182). The economics literature differentiates between two forms of triadic relations: ‘triadic‐by‐assertion’, where a third party inserts themselves into a dyadic relation for its own benefit; and ‘triadic‐by‐invitation’, where a party is invited into a dyadic relationship by one or more parties to help facilitate the relationship (Podemska‐Mikluch & Wagner, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When exit is costly, political exchanges still operate because the world of democratic political economy is constructed through transactions. With costly exit, however, those transactions take on triadic character (Podemska-Mikluch and Wagner 2013). With triadic exchanges, there are both winners and losers in any transaction.…”
Section: Voice Exit and The Control Of Factionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For political transactions, however, the magic number is three. In other words, market transactions are fundamentally dyadic but political transactions fundamentally are triadic, with gainers imposing cost on losers (Podemska-Mikluch and Wagner 2013).…”
Section: Exploring Some Boundary Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At base, entangled political economy is centered on networks and evolutionary processes of development, where that development is kept in motion by individual efforts to seek gain by putting together deals that often are triadic (Eusepi and Wagner 2011;Podemska-Mikluch and Wagner 2013), meaning that they often feature a winning subset of people gaining at the expense of others in society. 1 While the mixed economy orientation also features evolution, that evolution is more akin to majority cycling than to the continual injection of novelty into society.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%