2006
DOI: 10.1080/00016350500474565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dye staining gap test: An alternative method for assessing marginal gap formation in composite restorations

Abstract: Dye staining the gaps can be used with good reliability to evaluate the gap formation in composite restorations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The detected gaps were measured by a digital system that has presented reliable results. The gaps identified by the digital system are easy to carry out and the results are valid when compared to a scanning electronic microscopy analysis of the same gaps 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The detected gaps were measured by a digital system that has presented reliable results. The gaps identified by the digital system are easy to carry out and the results are valid when compared to a scanning electronic microscopy analysis of the same gaps 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…After storage, Caries Detector ® (Kuraray Co., Osaka, Japan) was applied on the restoration margins for 5 s, followed by rinsing in tap water gentle air drying 1 . Two black dots were drawn 2 mm apart with a pen using a digital caliper rule to calibrate the measurement used in the Image Tool 3.0 software (University of Texas, Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, images of each restorative surface were captured at X40 magnification. After that, the digitalized images were analyzed using the Image J software (National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, USA) 1 , 28 . The %MI was calculated as the ratio of the stained cavity interface to the entire cavity perimeter by using the following formula:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main factors that determine shrinkage stress and consequently, gap formation in composite restorations are degree of polymerization shrinkage, elastic modulus, and viscosity of the composite. [ 2 ] Flowable composite resins have been reported to improve marginal adaptation of restorations in relation to their rheological properties. Due to their relative flexibility and low modulus of elasticity, when employed as an intermediate layer, these liners help relieve stresses during polymerization shrinkage of the composite restorations and may provide better adaptation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%