2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00445-023-01684-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyke to sill deflection in the shallow heterogeneous crust during glacier retreat: part I

Kyriaki Drymoni,
Alessandro Tibaldi,
Fabio Luca Bonali
et al.

Abstract: Dykes and sills occupy Mode I (extension), Mode II (shear), or hybrid mode fractures and most of the time transport and store magma from deep reservoirs to the surface. Subject to their successful propagation, they feed volcanic eruptions. Yet, dykes and sills can also stall and become arrested as a result of the crust’s heterogeneous and anisotropic characteristics. Dykes can become deflected at mechanical discontinuities to form sills, and vice versa. Although several studies have examined dyke propagation i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coupled methodologies, such as pairing geological observations with numerical modelling provide a better understanding of sill formation, showing their mechanical evolution into magma chambers (Hardee 1982;Coleman et al 2004;Barnett and Gudmundsson 2014), and their thermal evolution in the layered crust (Cashman et al 2017;Annen et al 2006). This is a compound article (Part II) with our previous work (Drymoni et al 2023c) which aim to collectively explore, using finite element method (FEM) numerical modelling, the mechanical and geometrical conditions that dictate the emplacement of sills in the shallow crust in nonglacial and glacial settings. In Part I, we explored how the magma overpressure, the local stress field (extension or compression), the presence (or not) of a very weak contact influence dyke to sill deflection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Coupled methodologies, such as pairing geological observations with numerical modelling provide a better understanding of sill formation, showing their mechanical evolution into magma chambers (Hardee 1982;Coleman et al 2004;Barnett and Gudmundsson 2014), and their thermal evolution in the layered crust (Cashman et al 2017;Annen et al 2006). This is a compound article (Part II) with our previous work (Drymoni et al 2023c) which aim to collectively explore, using finite element method (FEM) numerical modelling, the mechanical and geometrical conditions that dictate the emplacement of sills in the shallow crust in nonglacial and glacial settings. In Part I, we explored how the magma overpressure, the local stress field (extension or compression), the presence (or not) of a very weak contact influence dyke to sill deflection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Specifically, the contrasting stiffness (i.e., Young's modulus) between the upper and the bottom layer of a contact where E upper > E bottom can rotate the stress field ahead of the dyke tip (σ 1 becomes horizontal) and a dyke can be stalled. In rift zones, previous dyke injections or graben subsidence induce compressional regimes that make stiff (high Young's modulus) layers (e.g., lava deposits) temporary stress barriers (Gudmundsson 1995;Roman et al 2004;Geshi et al 2012;Kusumoto et al 2013;Tibaldi et al 2022;Drymoni et al 2023c). Similarly, soft (low Young's modulus) layers, such as pyroclastic deposits, tend to concentrate the horizontal compressive stress especially in areas under local extension (Gudmundsson and Brenner 2001) and become stress barriers as well.…”
Section: Stress Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations