2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-014-0225-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Acousto-Elasticity in a Fatigue-Cracked Sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitudinal, shear (Lott et al 2017) and complex flexural deformation from impacts (Eiras et al 2016) have been used as excitation. The response of a single fatigue crack was investigated (Rivière et al 2014) as well as the in situ nonlinearity of soil on the scale of metres using seismic equipment and a vibrator truck (Renaud et al 2014). Rivière et al (2016) studied the frequency, pressure and strain dependency of the nonlinear response.…”
Section: Daet Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal, shear (Lott et al 2017) and complex flexural deformation from impacts (Eiras et al 2016) have been used as excitation. The response of a single fatigue crack was investigated (Rivière et al 2014) as well as the in situ nonlinearity of soil on the scale of metres using seismic equipment and a vibrator truck (Renaud et al 2014). Rivière et al (2016) studied the frequency, pressure and strain dependency of the nonlinear response.…”
Section: Daet Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering possible experimental application, the method would allow one to perform an in-situ imaging of the defect. Therefore, the external laser vibrometer scanning of the sample done in previous time reversal applications [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] to detect the re-focusing of the second harmonic would not be necessary. Fig.…”
Section: Closed Crack Imaging From Fundamental and Second Harmonic Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts at nonlinear ultrasonic imaging can be divided into two groups depending on whether the image reconstruction process involves (i) a point by point scanning of the ultrasonic response at every point (or pixel) within a prescribed imaging domain, usually (but not necessarily) using a laser vibrometer [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], or (ii) implementing an imaging algorithm that uses as input the measurements recorded by a sensor array deployed around and outside the imaging domain [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65]. The present work belongs to the second group, which is of greater interest for structural health monitoring based on built-in sensor arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Dynamic Acousto-Elastic Testing is a low frequency pump and higher frequency probe technique that was used by Rivière et al to extract and additional nonlinear parameters. 15 Ohara et al used NRUS to locate SCC by analyzing the measured from a couple different resonance modes based on whether the mode had a strain node or antinode at the location of the SCC. 16 An experiment by Morlock et al used nonlinear Rayleigh surface waves to characterize SCC on four samples with different amounts of SCC.…”
Section: Chapter 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%